Re: [vpp-dev] VPP and RCU?

2018-10-31 Thread Florin Coras
> On Oct 30, 2018, at 9:02 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli > wrote: > > > > Hi Stephen, > > No, we don’t support RCU. Wouldn’t rw-locks be enough to support your >> usecases? > > Florin > >> On Oct 29, 2018, at 12:40 PM, Stephen Hemminger >> wrote: >>

Re: [vpp-dev] 18.10 release artifacts

2018-10-31 Thread Marco Varlese
I am going to check with Vanessa... On Tue, 2018-10-30 at 21:32 +, Michal Cmarada via Lists.Fd.Io wrote: jvpp-ioampot -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11049): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11049 Mute This Topic: https://li

Re: [vpp-dev]ping local address

2018-10-31 Thread Neale Ranns via Lists.Fd.Io
Hi Saint, With this change an attacker could send a packet with both the source and destination both set to one of VPP’s own addresses. If you include in this new sub-condition to only accept locally generated packets, then we should be good (b->flags & VNET_BUFFER_F_LOCALLY_ORIGINATED). Regar

Re: [vpp-dev]ping local address

2018-10-31 Thread saint_sun 孙 via Lists . Fd . Io
OK , it is better, I will try, thanks! saint_...@aliyun.com From: Neale Ranns (nranns) Date: 2018-10-31 17:01 To: saint_...@aliyun.com CC: vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev]ping local address Hi Saint, With this change an attacker could send a packet with both the source and destination both se

[vpp-dev] FD.io CSIT Project weekly meeting - UTC GMT time change, UK and EU no change

2018-10-31 Thread Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) via Lists.Fd.Io
Hi, Just wanted to make everyone aware that today’s call is taking place at 15:00-16:00 UTC, as UK and Europe moved away from Daylight Saving Time (BST, CEST respectively), and looking thru the window Summer time is definitely over, so time to change our regular habits :) Updated details are in

Re: [vpp-dev] auto-abandon

2018-10-31 Thread Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) via Lists.Fd.Io
> https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/user-change-cleanup.html Pros are worth it. Contributors can still Restore (and rebase) manually if needed, when they receive an e-mail about the auto-abandon hitting their Change. > Should we enable that? +1. Vratko. From: vpp-dev@lists.

Re: [vpp-dev] auto-abandon

2018-10-31 Thread Jim Thompson
It would seem to make it difficult to find a half-implemented feature. “Has anyone tried this before?” Case in-point: L3SPAN (#9336), which seems abandoned, but is of interest. Jim > On Oct 26, 2018, at 3:01 PM, Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io > wrote: > > > Folks, > > Gerrit have this nic

[vpp-dev] TAP v1/v2 API questions

2018-10-31 Thread Coulson, Ken
Per emails on this list tap v1 is being deprecated. tap v1 create/modify/delete and tap v2 is different in that it only has create/delete. Some questions: Is the intent to create a tap v2 modify API and/or to add capabilities to set interface API? tap APIs presently have no MTU setting. Is ther

[vpp-dev] Regarding buffer chains with vlib_buffer_t

2018-10-31 Thread Prashant Upadhyaya
Hi, I have two buffer chains whose starting vlib_buffer_t's are -- vlib_buffer_t* chainHead1; (let's call this chain1) vlib_buffer_t* chainHead2; (let's call this chain2) The chain1, chain2 may have one or more buffers each. Is there any convenience function which connects the last buffer of fir

Re: [vpp-dev] Regarding buffer chains with vlib_buffer_t

2018-10-31 Thread Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io
> On 31 Oct 2018, at 19:42, Prashant Upadhyaya wrote: > > Hi, > > I have two buffer chains whose starting vlib_buffer_t's are -- > vlib_buffer_t* chainHead1; (let's call this chain1) > vlib_buffer_t* chainHead2; (let's call this chain2) > The chain1, chain2 may have one or more buffers each.

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP and RCU?

2018-10-31 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:24:36 -0700 Florin Coras wrote: > No reader-writer locks are 100's of times slower. In fact reader > write locks are slower than normal spin lock. > > >>> > >>> I guess you meant that in general, and I can see how for scenarios with > >> multiple write

Re: [vpp-dev] [tsc] Project Proposal for Sweetcomb

2018-10-31 Thread Ni, Hongjun
Welcome ZTE to join! Thanks, Hongjun From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Ni, Hongjun Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 9:22 AM To: Edward Warnicke Cc: t...@lists.fd.io; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Wang, Drenfong ; ??? ; chen...@huachentel.com; lizhuo...@cmhi.chinamobil

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP and RCU?

2018-10-31 Thread Florin Coras
> On Oct 31, 2018, at 4:03 PM, Stephen Hemminger > wrote: > > On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:24:36 -0700 > Florin Coras wrote: > >> No reader-writer locks are 100's of times slower. In fact reader >> write locks are slower than normal spin lock. >> > > I guess you meant that i

[vpp-dev] hi

2018-10-31 Thread 沈先捷
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11062): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11062 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/27812346/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch

[vpp-dev] Run failed on 1807 version vpp code on centos7.

2018-10-31 Thread 沈先捷
Hi,     make run didn't seem to work,              Logs : [root@localhost vpp]# ls build-data  build-root  docs  doxygen  dpdk  extras  gmod  LICENSE  MAINTAINERS  Makefile  README.md  RELEASE.md  src  test  virtualenv [root@localhost vpp]#  [root@localhost vpp]# make run WARNING: STARTUP_CONF n