Dear Andrew
I tested your patch and my problem still exist, but my service status changed
and now there isn't any information about deadlock problem. Do you have any
idea about how I can provide you more information?
root@MYRB:~# service vpp status
* vpp.service - vector packet processing engin
Hi all,
My version is 17.04, I encountered a memory leaking problem, the RES memory of
VPP is increasing slowly and continuously.
I shutdown all interfaces and set break points on memory allocate functions,
such as malloc,calloc,realloc, mmap, vmalloc, clib_mem_alloc,
mheap_alloc_with_flags.
Dear Rubina,
thank you for quickly checking it!
Judging by the logs the VPP quits, so I would say there should be a
core file, could you check ?
If you find it (doublecheck by the timestamps that it is indeed the
fresh one), you can load it in gdb (using gdb 'path-to-vpp-binary'
'path-to-core')
Hi Guys,
I need CSIT perf testing to test patch.
I have known that vpp-verify-perf-l2 can trigger perf test, but I
only see the X520 results.
My questions are :
1. how to trigger XL710 perf test?
2. What do we compare it to ... have the nightly build results?
Hi
I have a question about vpp stateful mode. It seems that vpp stateful mode
hasn't implemented completely. I mean there aren't any feature same as contrack
in linux kernel. So, vpp doesn't have any mechanism to handle TCP sessions
based on different flags. For example I sent TCP three way hand
Hi Rubina,
I designed the stateful mode to be just a bit more than the ACL, with
a "diode" state, rather than going for the fully fledged firewall
model - as a balance between the simplicity and the functionality.
The full tracking of the TCP state machine was not in scope - getting
into that ter
Dear Andrew
I cleaned everything and created a new deb packages by your patch once again.
With your patch I never see deadlock again, but still I have throughput problem
in my scenario.
-Per port stats table
ports | 0 | 1
-
Thanks a lot for your prompt answer. :)
From: Andrew 👽 Yourtchenko
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 1:10 PM
To: Rubina Bianchi
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Support for TCP flag
Hi Rubina,
I designed the stateful mode to be just a bit more than the AC
Ravi,
On Sun, 2018-05-27 at 12:20 -0700, Ravi Kerur wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a VM(16.04.4 Ubuntu x86_64) with 2 cores and 4G RAM. I have
> installed VPP successfully on it. Later I have created vhost-user
> interfaces via
>
> create vhost socket /var/run/vpp/sock1.sock server
> create vhost so
Hi!
I have been trying to test VPP's potential for TCP/IP latency optimization.
When I run socket_test.sh without any special parameters (so just comparison
between native-kernel, native-vcl and native-preload) it seems that preload
around six times worse than kernel. I have also tried this sam
Hi Marco,
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 6:30 AM, Marco Varlese wrote:
> Ravi,
>
> On Sun, 2018-05-27 at 12:20 -0700, Ravi Kerur wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a VM(16.04.4 Ubuntu x86_64) with 2 cores and 4G RAM. I have
>> installed VPP successfully on it. Later I have created vhost-user
>> interfaces v
Ravi,
I install corekeeper and the core file is kept in /var/crash. But why not use
gdb to attach to the VPP process?
To turn on VPP vhost-user debug, type "debug vhost-user on" at the VPP prompt.
Steven
On 5/29/18, 9:10 AM, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of Ravi Kerur"
wrote:
Hi Marco
Steve,
Thanks for inputs on debugs and gdb. I am using gdb on my development
system to debug the issue. I would like to have reliable core
generation on the system on which I don't have access to install gdb.
I installed corekeeper and it still doesn't generate core. I am
running vpp inside a VM (
Hi Damjan,
Thanks.
Yes I do see show run hitting the sample plugin.
I sent one ping packet request.
sample active 1 1
0 2.67e41.00
I would like to stick to current version of VPP.
Is there a known issue
Hi Damjan,
Some observations:
#1
gdb) set args unix { interactive cli-listen /run/vpp/cli.sock full-coredump
} plugin_path
/home/harish/vpp_0524/vpp/build-root/install-vpp_debug-native/sample-plugin/lib64/vpp_plugins
dpdk { uio-driver igb_uio dev :07:00.0 dev :07:00.1 }
(gdb) r
Starting p
Hi all,
I closed transparent hugepage function, then the RES memory does not increase
anymore, is that ok?
echo never > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled
echo never > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/defrag
Regards
在 2018-05-29 16:01:27，"xulang" 写道：
Hi all,
My version is 17.04
16 matches
Mail list logo
