Thank Steven and Alec
I'm using the iperf as a basic tool to check sanity - i'll run pktgen on
the VMs later.
the resut i'm got 20Mbps (~20K pps) throughput and latency of 1ms is not
iperf issue.
Steven - you suggest to set the rx-queue-size when lanuching the VM but
unfortunately i dont find thi
Fyi
When i launch another image (not based on the clear-linux-kvm) - i'm
achieving good performance (exactly like ovs-dpdk - which is expected in
single flow/mac )
any idea why ?
this is the launch cmdline: [anyway i cant find a way to set the
tx/rx-queue-size)
sudo qemu-system-x86_64 -name vho
Subtle annoyance #67 - "OK, we had a power failure. Where is my static out2in
nat44 mapping?" - explained.
I use vpp as a home gateway, in conjunction with a cable modem.
The following debug CLI command works perfectly, except in a full power-cycle
router and cable modem scenario: "nat44 add st
Hi, Sara,
May I know what image you are using to achieving the good performance with VPP?
I assume you are running the same iperf3 testings?
Thanks very much!
Regards,
Yichen
From: on behalf of Sara Gittlin
Date: Sunday, March 25, 2018 at 5:31 AM
To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Subject: Re: [vpp-
Sara,
You need qemu 2.8.0 or later for the rx_queue_size option to work.
Steven
From: on behalf of Sara Gittlin
Date: Sunday, March 25, 2018 at 1:57 AM
To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Very poor performance vm to vm via VPP vhostuser
Thank Steven an
Hi Dave,
Static mapping entry is deleted from resolution vector after address is set on
interface
snat_ip4_add_del_interface_address_cb:
/* If we resolved any of the outstanding static mappings */
if (vec_len(indices_to_delete))
{
/* Delete them */
for (j =
