I have installed VPP16.06 on ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS and it has 2 SRIO-V
interfaces.
Before starting the VPP service the interfaces work and are pingable.
Then I follow below steps.
#sudo ifconfig ens224 down
#sudo ip addr flush dev ens224
#sudo service vpp start
#sudo vppctl set int ip address Gigab
I don’t see ip4-classify in the next nodes for ip4-inacl.
I am using 16.04 .
Any suggestions please?
From: Dharmaray Kundargi
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 10:29 AM
To: 'vpp-dev@lists.fd.io'
Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] VPP classifier node plugin not invoked.
Thanks Shwetha
I tried with setting for
[SOLVED]
the variable must be declared as ==> extern adj_index_t adj_index;
In my case, I have 3 workers configured. Now it works.
Cheers,
Alessio
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Alessio Silvestro
wrote:
> Hi Neale,
>
> thanks for the info.
>
> I was already doing that, but I get an unpredi
Ip4-inacl != ip4-classify. If you want packets to visit ip4-classify, you need
to install a classify adjacency in the FIB. See .../ip/lookup.c / “ip route
1.2.3.4/8 via classify ” debug CLI command.
I understand that not having things work the way you expect them to is
frustrating. I would love
Hi Andrej,
VPP does not run IPv6 neighbour unreachability detection (NUD) so, in the
absence of an interface down signal, VPP will not be aware that the endpoint is
no longer reachable.
/neale
From: on behalf of Andrej Mak
Date: Thursday, 13 July 2017 at 14:00
To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Sub
Hi Alessio,
Don’t call adj_nbr_add_or_lock from a worker thread, it must only be called
from the main thread – the adjacency DB is not thread safe. Stash the result of
the call in your ‘key’ object.
/neale
From: Alessio Silvestro
Date: Friday, 14 July 2017 at 14:15
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
> On 14 Jul 2017, at 09:14, SAKTHIVEL ANAND S wrote:
>
> I have installed VPP16.06 on ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS and it has 2 SRIO-V
> interfaces.
> Before starting the VPP service the interfaces work and are pingable.
> Then I follow below steps.
>
> #sudo ifconfig ens224 down
> #sudo ip addr flush
Hi,
The code seems to be highly tuned for cache performance. If I want to add
some more fields in the existing structures, are there any performance
concerns?
For example, if I want to add some fields in the frame structure
(vlib_frame_t), are there dangers of affecting performance?
Thanks,
--
Hi,
The packets in a frame (a batch of packets) can be split (if they goes to
different next node). Are there places where packets from different frames
are merged into one frame?
Thanks,
--
Yuliang Li
PhD student
Department of Computer Science
Yale University
___
Hi all,
With cmd "vppctl pcap tx trace on", I have caught tx packets, any guides?
Regards,
Ewan
yug...@telincn.com
From: yug...@telincn.com
Date: 2017-07-13 12:13
To: vpp-dev
Subject: tx_packet_error
Hi all,
After hours of running, vpp can rx packets, but can't tx packets.
Here is the result
Thanks,
Ewan
yug...@telincn.com
From: Dave Barach (dbarach)
Date: 2017-07-13 19:59
To: Luke, Chris; yug...@telincn.com; vpp-dev
Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] trace
Folks,
If one wants/needs to trace packets which vpp creates from whole cloth, here’s
how to do it. Typically, it’s an input-node func
Hi all,
If vpp is running on the vm, everything is ok. But on physical host system,
somethimes it can't work after a while, sometimes it takes a day. Func
"rte_eth_tx_burst" returns 1 when things go right, returns 0 when things go
wrong.
Anyone has met this before or has any clue?
Regards,
Ewa
*This is a vpp config :*
set int ip address GigabitEthernet0/4/0 192.168.30.135/24
set int state GigabitEthernet0/4/0 up
set int ip address GigabitEthernet0/5/0 192.168.40.135/24
set int state GigabitEthernet0/5/0 up
trace add dpdk-input 100
show trace
*this is a bt output:*
#0 0x7
13 matches
Mail list logo
