Have you considered to use process nodes instead?
If you search forvlib_process_suspend and vlib_process_wait_for_event_or_clock
you will find many samples….
Thanks,
Damjan
> On 16 Jan 2017, at 02:13, yug...@telincn.com wrote:
>
> Thanks for your reply, Dave.
> I would like to use dpdk timer
After discussion on the weekly call I improved my patch, and would like to ask
people
to give it a try and provide feedback.
It is:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/4613/
It works as follows:
- If there is no development package (vpp-dpdk-dev (deb) or vpp-dpdk-devel
(rpm).
It will just display wa
+Ed - known to be able to resolve tricky cross-project build issues.
+vpp-dev - to avoid circular thread references :)
Sergio,
On 11 Jan 2017, at 17:00, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
mailto:sergio.gonzalez.mon...@intel.com>>
wrote:
I'll copy from the thread I started last week, we continue on this on
//resending with corrected Kirill email
+Ed - known to be able to resolve tricky cross-project build issues.
+vpp-dev - to avoid circular thread references :)
Sergio,
On 11 Jan 2017, at 17:00, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
mailto:sergio.gonzalez.mon...@intel.com>>
wrote:
I'll copy from the thread I
Can we please disable this test temporary as tests are failing?
Thanks,
Damjan
On 16 Jan 2017, at 17:12, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan)
mailto:mkons...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Hi, Got the report above are failing from time to time:
https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/3316/
h
With multiple tables(VRF), show interface addr display wrong table ID.
DBGvpp# create loopback interface
loop0
DBGvpp# set interface ip table loop0 1
DBGvpp# set interface ip address loop0 1.0.0.250/16
DBGvpp# sh int addr
local0 (dn):
loop0 (dn):
1.0.0.250/16 table 1
DBGvpp# set interface ip table
Folks,
We are seeing a really strange VPP API message processing problem.
The scenario goes like this...
Our CLI issues C API calls through the vlib API. The messages hit
the shared memory queue, but are not processed. They sit there.
Later, we fire up, say, vppctl and do a "show api" command.
I have tried that now, and it's working.
Thanks,
Ewan
yug...@telincn.com
From: Damjan Marion
Date: 2017-01-16 23:16
To: yugang
CC: Dave Barach (dbarach); vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] rte_timer
Have you considered to use process nodes instead?
If you search forvlib_process_suspend and vlib
Hi Choonho,
An interface can only reside in (a.k.a be bound to) a single table. So each
time you do;
Set int ip table loop0 X
You are changing the table it is bound to, not adding tables. So the output you
see at the end of the sequence is correct, the loopback has two addresses and
is bound
