[vpp-dev] vpp make test for verify - are we there yet ?

2016-12-12 Thread Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan)
Hello, Does anyone know if vpp make test is back on track to be ready to be used for vpp make verify jobs on a per patch basis? Being lazy I know - cause I could run it myself :) -Maciek ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io

Re: [vpp-dev] vxlan setup guidance

2016-12-12 Thread Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan)
+Florin, Fabio - in case they have comments re VXLAN-GPE vs. VXLAN. -Maciek On 9 Dec 2016, at 19:34, Matej Klotton -X (mklotton - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) mailto:mklot...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hello John, I agree with you. I’m familiar with VXLAN and now with VXLAN GPE which RFC I read on

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp make test for verify - are we there yet ?

2016-12-12 Thread Ole Troan
Maciek, No. There is a breakage with VXLAN. Here is the analysis from Neale: == ERROR: Encapsulation test -- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/vpp/test

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vpp make test for verify - are we there yet ?

2016-12-12 Thread Matej Klotton -X (mklotton - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
Hi, I fixed issue with VXLAN in https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/4194/ Matej. > -Original Message- > From: csit-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:csit-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On > Behalf Of Ole Troan > Sent: 12. decembra 2016 17:34 > To: Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) > Cc: csit-...@lists.

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vpp make test for verify - are we there yet ?

2016-12-12 Thread Ed Warnicke
Rebased my patch to restore make test on top of yours: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/4194/ Lets see if it verifies... Ed On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Matej Klotton -X (mklotton - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote: > Hi, > > I fixed issue with VXLAN in https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/4194/ >

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vHost user test scenarios for CSIT

2016-12-12 Thread Alec Hothan (ahothan)
Damon, This is indeed an interesting use case along with the container option. We use VPP as L2 xconnect in a VM as our loopback VM (instead of testpmd) and it is performing as well or better than testpmd. Would be a good L3 loopback option. I’m not sure CSIT would want to handle this as it requ

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vpp make test for verify - are we there yet ?

2016-12-12 Thread Ed Warnicke
Still failing: https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-master-centos7/2810/console Ed On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Ed Warnicke wrote: > Rebased my patch to restore make test on top of yours: > > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/4194/ > > Lets see if it verifies... > > Ed > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 a

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vpp make test for verify - are we there yet ?

2016-12-12 Thread Matej Klotton -X (mklotton - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
Failed test was MPLS, so I fixed in next patch set https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/4194/4 From: Ed Warnicke [mailto:hagb...@gmail.com] Sent: 13. decembra 2016 0:11 To: Matej Klotton -X (mklotton - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) Cc: Ole Troan ; Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) ; csit-...@lists.fd.

Re: [vpp-dev] vHost user test scenarios for CSIT - TWS meeting

2016-12-12 Thread Pierre Pfister (ppfister)
As per my action item from last meeting, I asked RedHat guy why they came up with testing with 2 physical interfaces instead of just one. And the answer is really that they did that out of simplicity. We should probably run some tests and see if using a single interface makes a difference (and t