Re: [vpp-dev] Problem while setting socket parameter

2016-11-23 Thread Deepak Jain4
HI, No requested ip (192.168.1.1/24 ) is not assigned.please find the output in attached file. Regards, Deepak -"Dave Barach (dbarach)" wrote: - To: Deepak Jain4 , "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" From: "Dave Barach (dbarach)" Date: 11/21/2016 06:42PM Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] Problem while setti

Re: [vpp-dev] [tldk-dev] TLDK meeting Calendar entry updated

2016-11-23 Thread Kinsella, Ray
Thanks Keith. On 22/11/2016 16:40, Keith Burns wrote: Please note I updated https://wiki.fd.io/view/Meetings to reflect that TLDK meeting is: NOW: - 7am Friday Pacific WAS: - 8am Wed Pacfic ___ tldk-dev mailing list tldk-...@lists.fd.io https://li

Re: [vpp-dev] Problem while setting socket parameter

2016-11-23 Thread Keith Burns
Potentially a couple of things wrong: 1.  3756520960 == 223.231.246.0  575366855 == 34.75.102.199 192.168.1.1 == 3232235777 Maybe some Endian badness going on here?  2. Where is the default route pointing at ? I’ve seen IGMP issues where if the default route isn’t pointing at the desired IGMP

Re: [vpp-dev] flowtable plugin

2016-11-23 Thread gannega
Hi Keith, This is a kind reminder. Also, I stumbled upon VPP-320, and especially https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/1676/ which adds a 6 Bytes of plugin_metadata in the opaque1 union, which has been reopened for nsh-proxy. I feel this might be a good way to go which would ensure no collision between the

Re: [vpp-dev] flowtable plugin

2016-11-23 Thread Keith Burns
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 5:23 AM gannega wrote: > Hi Keith, > > This is a kind reminder. > > Apologies for tardiness... > Also, I stumbled upon VPP-320, and especially > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/1676/ which adds a 6 Bytes of plugin_metadata > in the opaque1 union, which has been reopened for n

Re: [vpp-dev] flowtable plugin

2016-11-23 Thread gannega
Thanks for the explanation. So I can use anything I want within the opaque buffer as long as I don't presume what happens next. And ... I'm actually doing things I should not in the flowtable (which wasn't obvious to me until you explained it that way) ... so I'll go fix that. Thanks again, Be

Re: [vpp-dev] flowtable plugin

2016-11-23 Thread Keith Burns
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:15 AM gannega wrote: > Thanks for the explanation. > > So I can use anything I want within the opaque buffer as long as I don't > presume what happens next. > Well... not exactly... there's lots of comments explaining what each field is union'd for. But there is an opaq

Re: [vpp-dev] [groupbasedpolicy-dev] Vpp nodes not being netconf capable

2016-11-23 Thread Tomáš Čechvala
Hi Miguel, please check if HC sends required capabilities https://github.com/opendaylight/groupbasedpolicy/blob/82637edd95d47c8fc594bf8fa3027d378183ca0d/renderers/vpp/src/main/java/org/opendaylight/groupbasedpolicy/renderer/vpp/manager/VppNodeManager.java see initializeRequiredCapabilities() metho

Re: [vpp-dev] omg,vlan sub-interface seems not working

2016-11-23 Thread Damjan Marion (damarion)
Can you capture trace (trace add af-packet-input 5 / show trace) and share it here ? Thanks, Damjan On 22 Nov 2016, at 09:16, Chillance Zen mailto:chillance...@gmail.com>> wrote: hi,all when I was trying to use vlan sub-interface as a individual L3 interface (i.e. configure an IP address

Re: [vpp-dev] VLIB buffer size is 512 bytes

2016-11-23 Thread Damjan Marion
Buffer size is 2048, if packet is bigger then multiple buffers are chained. > On 21 Nov 2016, at 12:54, Dmitry Bufistov wrote: > > Hi VPP list! > > The VPP buffer size is set to 512 bytes in buffer.h > What about bigger packets? How does VPP handle them? > > Thanks a lot, > > Dmitry > __

Re: [vpp-dev] [vpp] does vpp support interface hotplugin?

2016-11-23 Thread Damjan Marion
> On 17 Nov 2016, at 03:07, Chillance Zen wrote: > > > Hi, dear all. > as far as I know , vpp is derived from cisco 's mature commercial > product,since accelerated with DPDK,it's very suitable for VNF appliance > ,and also this is what we are gonna do.one thing which confuses me is how > vpp s

Re: [vpp-dev] Vpp nodes not being netconf capable

2016-11-23 Thread Ni, Hongjun
Forward to: +sfc-...@lists.opendaylight.org +vpp-dev@lists.fd.io +groupbasedpolicy-...@lists.opendaylight.org -Original Message- From: honeycomb-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:honeycomb-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Yang, Yi Y Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 8:56 AM To: Miguel

[vpp-dev] VPP Compilation Issue on Centos

2016-11-23 Thread Sreejith Surendran Nair
Hi Team, I am using Centos 7 to build the VPP package but while running the vagrant build command I getting the below error with respect to Kernel headers ( no such file or directory). Could you please help and suggest if possible. [root@localhost 3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64]# uname -r 3.10.0-123.el7.

Re: [vpp-dev] dpdk/vpp and cross-version migration for vhost

2016-11-23 Thread Yuanhan Liu
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 04:53:05PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > You keep assuming that you have the VM started first and > > > figure out things afterwards, but this does not work. > > > > > > Think about a cluster of machines. You want to start a VM in > > > a way that will ensure compa

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Compilation Issue on Centos

2016-11-23 Thread Christophe FONTAINE
Hi, Did you installed all dependencies thru ‘make install-dep’ first ? On a fresh centos7 system / platform, I always do: - export PLATFORM=’’ (default is ‘vpp’) - make bootstrap - make install-dep - make pkg-rpm Christophe From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd

Re: [vpp-dev] [vpp] does vpp support interface hotplugin?

2016-11-23 Thread yu scott
Hi Marion, *Does next release version support hotplugins?* *BTW, hotplugins is very importance for VPP used for NFV.* 2016-11-24 4:13 GMT+08:00 Damjan Marion : > > > On 17 Nov 2016, at 03:07, Chillance Zen wrote: > > > > > > Hi, dear all. > > as far as I know , vpp is derived from cisco 's mat