For visibility, updated RH 2544 testing results with 16.12.rc0
This is PVP testing and shows up vhost-user perf compared with OVS/DPDK
Once we have vhost-user merged and tested in CSIT I would expect to see
significant improvement.
--TFH
On 11/03/2016 02:51 PM, Karl Rister wrote:
Hi All
Be
On 10/26/2016 02:18 AM, Pierre Pfister (ppfister) wrote:
>
>>>
>>> You may also want to try 'chrt -r' on your working processes. This
>>> improves scheduling real-time properties.
>
> I took a look at the google sheet.
> I really think you should give 'chrt -r' a try.
>
Is there a reason why yo
; csit-...@lists.fd.io; Edward Warnicke
; Thomas F Herbert
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] updated ovs vs. vpp results for 0.002% and 0% loss
The recheck failed.
https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/1937/console
Are you sure you updated qemu ?
Thanks,
- Pierre
Le 26 oct. 2016 à 07:32
to:rk...@redhat.com>>;
kris...@redhat.com<mailto:kris...@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] updated ovs vs. vpp results for 0.002% and 0% loss
On 10/25/2016 11:19 AM, Edward Warnicke wrote:
Pierre,
Do you have a ticket requesting an update of the Jenkin's qemu so we can get
Michalowski
mailto:bmich...@redhat.com>>, Billy McFall
mailto:bmcf...@redhat.com>>, Douglas Shakshober
mailto:dsh...@redhat.com>>
Cc : vpp-dev mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>, "Damjan Marion
(damarion)"
<<mailto:damar...@cisco.com>damar...@cisco.com<mailto:da
) ; Bill
Michalowski ; vpp-dev ; Rashid Khan
; kris...@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] updated ovs vs. vpp results for 0.002% and 0% loss
On 10/25/2016 11:19 AM, Edward Warnicke wrote:
Pierre,
Do you have a ticket requesting an update of the Jenkin's qemu so we can get
your patch unbl
:dsh...@redhat.com>>
*Cc :*vpp-dev mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>,
"Damjan Marion (damarion)" mailto:damar...@cisco.com>>
*Objet :*Re: [vpp-dev] updated ovs vs. vpp results for 0.002% and
0% loss
+Maciek Konstantynowicz CSIT (mkonstan)
+vpp-dev
;mailto:dsh...@redhat.com>>
*Cc :*vpp-dev mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>,
"Damjan Marion (damarion)"
*Objet :*Re: [vpp-dev] updated ovs vs. vpp results for 0.002% and 0%
loss
+Maciek Konstantynowicz CSIT (mkonstan)
+vpp-dev
+Damjan Marion (damarion)
Karl, Thanks!
Your re
gt; *De : * au nom de Thomas F Herbert <
> therb...@redhat.com>
> *Date : *lundi 24 octobre 2016 à 21:32
> *À : *"kris...@redhat.com" , Andrew Theurer <
> atheu...@redhat.com>, Franck Baudin , Rashid Khan <
> rk...@redhat.com>, Bill Michalowski , Billy McFal
ll Michalowski
mailto:bmich...@redhat.com>>, Billy McFall
mailto:bmcf...@redhat.com>>, Douglas Shakshober
mailto:dsh...@redhat.com>>
*Cc : *vpp-dev mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>,
"Damjan Marion (damarion)"
<<mailto:damar...@cisco.com>damar...@cisco.com>
gt;> *Date : *lundi 24 octobre 2016 à 21:32
>>> *À : *"<mailto:kris...@redhat.com>kris...@redhat.com"
>>> mailto:kris...@redhat.com>>, Andrew Theurer
>>> mailto:atheu...@redhat.com>>, Franck Baudin
>>> mailto:fbau...@redhat.com>>, Ra
mailto:bmcf...@redhat.com>>, Douglas Shakshober
mailto:dsh...@redhat.com>>
*Cc :*vpp-dev mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>,
"Damjan Marion (damarion)" <mailto:damar...@cisco.com>>
*Objet :*Re: [vpp-dev] updated ovs vs. vpp results for 0.002% and 0% loss
+Maciek Konstan
com>>, Rashid Khan
mailto:rk...@redhat.com>>, Bill Michalowski
mailto:bmich...@redhat.com>>, Billy McFall
mailto:bmcf...@redhat.com>>, Douglas Shakshober
mailto:dsh...@redhat.com>>
Cc : vpp-dev mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>, "Damjan Marion
(dam
: vpp-dev , "Damjan Marion (damarion)"
Objet : Re: [vpp-dev] updated ovs vs. vpp results for 0.002% and 0% loss
+Maciek Konstantynowicz CSIT (mkonstan)
+vpp-dev
+Damjan Marion (damarion)
Karl, Thanks!
Your results seem close to consistent with VPP's CSIT testing for vhost f
+Maciek Konstantynowicz CSIT (mkonstan)
+vpp-dev
+Damjan Marion (damarion)
Karl, Thanks!
Your results seem close to consistent with VPP's CSIT testing for vhost
for 16.09 but for broader visibility, I am including some people on the
VPP team, Damjan who is working on multi-queue etc. (I see
15 matches
Mail list logo
