ut this time, the second queue received no packets . ( it received 24 packets
when RSS enbaled). Weird ..
mik...@yeah.net
From: Damjan Marion
Date: 2018-12-20 20:39
To: mik...@yeah.net
CC: alp.ars...@xflowresearch.com; vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] dpdk-input : serious load imbalance
> On 20 Dec 2018, at 05:19, mik...@yeah.net wrote:
>
>Thanks for you advice. That helps a lot. The result of DPDK testpmd is
> almost the same. It seems something wrong with DPDK.
>
Or the card. Have you tried to play with RSS options?
--
Damjan
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You rece
ok , thanks anyway.
mik...@yeah.net
From: Damjan Marion
Date: 2018-12-19 16:04
To: mik...@yeah.net
CC: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] dpdk-input : serious load imbalance
Yeah, I did not expect change, but at least we know that RSS is confiugred on
this card:
rss avail: ipv4
tx q1bytes 3039300
mik...@yeah.net
From: Damjan Marion
Date: 2018-12-19 15:46
To: mik...@yeah.net
CC: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] dpdk-input : serious load imbalance
Can you try to capture "show hardw" with 18.10 ?
Looks like ThunderX is
ultiseg
rx queues 2, rx desc 1024, tx queues 2, tx desc 1024
cpu socket 0
local0 0 down local0
local
mik...@yeah.net
From: Damjan Marion
Date: 2018-12-18 20:38
To: mik...@yeah.net
CC: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] dpdk-input : serious load imbalance
What kind of nic do you have? Can y
12
> tx q0bytes3300
> tx q1packets 11052
> tx q1bytes 3039300
>
>
> mik...@yeah.net <mailto:mik...@yeah.net>
>
> From: Damjan Marion <mailto:dmar...
From: Damjan Marion <mailto:dmar...@me.com>
> Date: 2018-12-19 15:21
> To: mik...@yeah.net <mailto:mik...@yeah.net>
> CC: vpp-dev <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] dpdk-input : serious load imbalance
>
> What version of VPP do you use.
> I'm
carrier down
> flags: pmd maybe-multiseg
> rx queues 2, rx desc 1024, tx queues 2, tx desc 1024
> cpu socket 0
>
> local0 0 down local0
> local
>
> mik...@yeah.net <mailto:mik...@yeah.net>
>
> From: Damjan Marion <mailto:dmar...@me.com>
> Date: 2018
What kind of nic do you have? Can you capture "show hardw" ?
--
Damjan
> On 18 Dec 2018, at 04:03, mik...@yeah.net wrote:
>
> Hi,
>I configured 2 worker thread and 2 dpdk rx-queuein startup.conf . Then I
> forged 400w packets and send them to a single dpdk interface . It turns out
> that
