It is also largely unimplemented RFC2473 tunnels.
Best regards,
Ole
> From: Vikram Sachdeva
> Date: Monday, 18 January 2021 at 10:26
> To: Neale Ranns
> Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] GRE Tunnel IP6 over IP6
>
> Hi Neale,
> Please refer to ICMPv4 packets 1
d.io>>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] GRE Tunnel IP6 over IP6
Hi Neale,
Please find the pcap attached.
I have created two tunnels IPv4 GRE tunnel and & IPv6 based tunnel.
The IPv4 based tunnel is working fine where as IPv6 based tunnels the packets
are getting dropped.
--
Vikram
On Tue,
Hi Vikram,
I don’t see a v6 tunnel encapped packet in that trace.
/neale
From: Vikram Sachdeva
Date: Monday, 18 January 2021 at 09:11
To: Neale Ranns
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] GRE Tunnel IP6 over IP6
Hi Neale,
Please find the pcap attached.
I have created two tunnels
Hi Neale,
Please find the pcap attached.
I have created two tunnels IPv4 GRE tunnel and & IPv6 based tunnel.
The IPv4 based tunnel is working fine where as IPv6 based tunnels the
packets are getting dropped.
--
*Vikram*
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 9:43 PM Neale Ranns wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> It’s not c
Hi,
It’s not clear [to me at least] why the packet in your trace was dropped. It
was an IPv6 packet to/from the tunnel src/dst, but it has IPv6 extension header
for ‘destination options’. VPP was not able to read past this header for
reasons I cannot say from that trace alone. I would suggest y
