You are very welcome.
Best regards,
Filip Varga
st 28. 9. 2022 o 16:32 Amir Hossein <1377amirhossein1...@gmail.com>
napísal(a):
> Oh you're right.
> thanks to your guidance i was able to reach correct configuration.
> thanks a lot!
>
>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages
Oh you're right.
thanks to your guidance i was able to reach correct configuration.
thanks a lot!
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#21943): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/21943
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/93820447/216
"Using vrf routes and tables affect selected tx_fib_index but address
allocation for snat(nat_ed_alloc_addr_and_port function) is based on
rx_fib_index."
- Pretty sure that's not true at all I would know as a maintainer of nat
:). If tx_fib_index is supplied then resolution of the pool address is
thanks for your detail answer.
but again my goal is to have separate nat ip pool per output interface.
in my case i have one in interface and two out if, i want out if1 uses nat ip
address A and out if2 uses nat ip address B.
using vrf routes and tables affect selected tx_fib_index but address al
Hi Amir,
If I understand your use case correctly you have 2 inside and 2 outside
interfaces. 2 outside belong to two different ISPs. You want communication
entering inside interface one to go through let's say outside interface one
and vice versa for the other two.
inside 1 <-> outside 1
inside 2
Hi Filip,
thanks for suggestion,
so i can have a vrf(rx) use nat ip pool from another tenant vrf?
I'm a little confused about using nat vrf routes can you give me an example?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#21911): https://lists.fd.io
Hi Ole ,
thanks for hint, but i can't see how using output-feature helps me to have
different pool for out interface?(a->fib_index == rx_fib_index is in
tx_sw_if_index != ~0 too)
can you elaborate more pls?
Thanks.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/
Hi,
I would suggest checking vrf table implementation in NAT44-ED that enables
restriction of passing packets between different VRFs for more information
check commit 691c630b79ec2230b67944c8a9f77f95b49d95ad
Meanwhile I will look if there is something else to use. If I find
something I will respo
Hi Amir,
Have you tried configuring the NAT with “output-feature” enabled?
Best regards,
Ole
> On 21 Sep 2022, at 06:43, Amir Hossein <1377amirhossein1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
> I'm working with nat44-ed plugin and I found that we can set a distinct nat
> ip pool for each in if (with
Hi,
I'm working with nat44-ed plugin and I found that we can set a distinct nat
ip pool for each in if (with tenant-vrf) and we can have multiple out if.
But is there a way to have a distinct nat ip pool for each out if?
Imagine a scenario in which a host connects to two isps (with two if each
wit
10 matches
Mail list logo
