multiple vPP processes.
I think it is not an expected behavior.
Regards,
Kingwel
原始邮件
主题： Re: [vpp-dev] dpdk: switch to in-memory mode, deprecate use of socket-mem
来自： "Dave Barach via Lists.Fd.Io"
发至： 2018年12月23日 上午12:37
抄送： Kingwel Xie ,dmar...@me.com,Matthew Smith
lt;mailto:dmar...@me.com>; Matthew Smith
mailto:mgsm...@netgate.com>>
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: Non-compliant mail - action required, contact
dm...@ericsson.se<mailto:dm...@ericsson.se> : Re: [vpp-dev] dpdk: switch to
in-memory mode, deprec
, contact dm...@ericsson.se : Re:
[vpp-dev] dpdk: switch to in-memory mode, deprecate use of socket-mem
Hi Matthew,
The patch (https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/16287/) was intended to allocate crypto
mem pool from DPDK, instead of from vPP. I guess you are using 2MB huge page,
so you are experienci
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Damjan Marion via
Lists.Fd.Io
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2018 2:02 AM
To: Matthew Smith
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] dpdk: switch to in-memory mode, deprecate use of
socket-mem
On 20 Dec 2018, at 18:46, Matthew Smith
mailto
> On 20 Dec 2018, at 18:46, Matthew Smith wrote:
>
>
> Hi Damjan,
>
> There is a comment that says "preallocate at least 16MB of hugepages per
> socket, if more is needed it is up to consumer to preallocate more". What
> does a consumer need to do in order to preallocate more?
This is jus
Hi Damjan,
There is a comment that says "preallocate at least 16MB of hugepages per
socket, if more is needed it is up to consumer to preallocate more". What
does a consumer need to do in order to preallocate more?
I've recently had problems using AES-GCM with IPsec on a test system.
Mempool all
Regarding:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/16543/
This patch switches dpdk to new in-memory mode, and reduces dpdk memory
footprint
as pages are allocated dynamically on-demand.
I tested on both Ubuntu and Centos 7.5 and everything looks good but will
appreciate
feedback from people using non-st
