There’s no good reason MPLS tunnels don’t have that feature. We’d gladly accept
the patch.
/neale
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of Pim van Pelt via
lists.fd.io
Date: Monday, 9 May 2022 at 12:28
To: Halit
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] creating mpls tunnel with
Hoi,
I don't know about the answer to MPLS, but did notice that GENEVE tunnels
also cannot be explicitly created by id:
create geneve tunnel create geneve tunnel local
{remote |group
} vni [encap-vrf-id ] [decap-next [l2|node ]]
[l3-mode] [del]
I agree that it (greatly) s
Looks like this question has been asked before a few times and as far i see,
answer was negative. I wonder if there is any change in plans.
Is there any plan to create mpls tunnel with an ID like other
tunnels/interfaces? - This would simplify certain automation.
create ipip tunnel
