11th June.
>>>
>>> --a
>>>
>>> On 2 Jun 2018, at 12:37, emma sdi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> -- Forwarded message --
>>> From: khers
>>> Date: Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 1:09 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev]
if you like,
>> before the 11th June.
>>
>> --a
>>
>> On 2 Jun 2018, at 12:37, emma sdi wrote:
>>
>>
>> ------ Forwarded message ----------
>> From: khers
>> Date: Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 1:09 PM
>> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] anomaly in
> On 2 Jun 2018, at 12:37, emma sdi wrote:
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: khers
> Date: Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 1:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] anomaly in deleting tcp idle session in vpp
> To: Andrew Yourtchenko
>
>
> Dear Andrew,
>
deleted, you might wanna give it a quick check if you like, before the 11th
June.
--a
> On 2 Jun 2018, at 12:37, emma sdi wrote:
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: khers
> Date: Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 1:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] anomaly in deletin
-- Forwarded message --
From: khers
Date: Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] anomaly in deleting tcp idle session in vpp
To: Andrew Yourtchenko
Dear Andrew,
I have observed a contradiction. In my test case, after being session table
full, vpp start to delete
If the table is full it should fifo-reuse the tcp transient sessions, not the
established ones.
--a
> On 30 May 2018, at 14:00, emma sdi wrote:
>
> Dear Folks,
> I have a problem with vpp stateful mode. I observed that vpp start to delete
> tcp idle sessions when session table is full. my que
Dear Folks,
I have a problem with vpp stateful mode. I observed that vpp start to
delete tcp idle sessions when session table is full. my question is this
behavior is implemented and indeed it is normal routine? or is this an
anomaly? because this behavior is not normal generally (for example in
co
