Hi Paul,
Good point.
Do you think it's worth adding an env var for running tests with
intermittent failures on the LF infra? In my experience, it is often
hard to reproduce intermittent failures locally so I'm thinking that in
may be useful to have a "penalty box" for flaky tests.
Or I can
Hi Dave,
Please don't add broken tests to extended tests.
See https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/24567/12/test/test_bfd.py
Thanks!
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 1:33 PM Dave Wallace wrote:
> Matt,
>
> I will keep an eye on this gerrit and merge it once the verify jobs have
> completed.
> If there are o
There is also test/scripts/test-loop.sh which might some users better.
Regards,
Klement
> On 12 Mar 2020, at 19:08, Dave Wallace wrote:
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> Your patch [0] verified, Ray +1'd it, and I merged it.
>
> In my investigation on Naginator retries, I found an unrelated gerrit change
> [
Hi Matt,
Your patch [0] verified, Ray +1'd it, and I merged it.
In my investigation on Naginator retries, I found an unrelated gerrit
change [1] where there was a VRRP test failure [2] on which failed the
vpp-arm-verify-master-ubuntu1804 job but subsequently passed on both the
Naginator retry
Hi Dave,
That sounds fine to me.
Thanks,
-Matt
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:32 AM Dave Wallace wrote:
> Matt,
>
> I will keep an eye on this gerrit and merge it once the verify jobs have
> completed.
> If there are other tests which fail, are you ok if I add them to this
> patch and turn it int
Matt,
I will keep an eye on this gerrit and merge it once the verify jobs have
completed.
If there are other tests which fail, are you ok if I add them to this
patch and turn it into a generic 'disable failing tests' gerrit change?
The other possibility is that this is due to the recent disab
Change submitted - https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/25834. Verification jobs
are running. Hopefully they won't fail :)
-Matt
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:22 AM Matthew Smith via Lists.Fd.Io wrote:
>
> I don't have a solution yet, but one observation has popped up quickly
>
> In the 2 failed jo
I don't have a solution yet, but one observation has popped up quickly
In the 2 failed jobs Ray sent links for, one of them had a test fail which
was not related to VRRP. There is a BFD6 test failure for the NAT change
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/25462:
https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yu
Yes.
Has been for a few days.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 9:25 AM Ray Kinsella wrote:
> Anyone else noticing seeming spurious failures related to the VRRP
> plugin's unit tests.
> Some examples from un-related commits.
>
> Ray K
>
> nat: timed out session scavenging upgrade (
> https://gerrit.fd.io/
Hi Ray,
Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I'll look into it.
-Matt
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 8:24 AM Ray Kinsella wrote:
> Anyone else noticing seeming spurious failures related to the VRRP
> plugin's unit tests.
> Some examples from un-related commits.
>
> Ray K
>
> nat: timed out sessio
Anyone else noticing seeming spurious failures related to the VRRP plugin's
unit tests.
Some examples from un-related commits.
Ray K
nat: timed out session scavenging upgrade (https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/25462)
https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/vpp-verify-master-ubuntu1804/2
11 matches
Mail list logo
