. Thanks for your clarification.
Best Regards,
Sun, Chenmin
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Florin Coras
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 10:24 PM
To: Sun, Chenmin
Cc: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP checksum behavior problems
Hi Chenmin,
If packets are marked as having a bad csum, or
> 00:06:42:512308: error-drop
> rx:1/2
> 00:06:42:512323: drop
> ip4-local: bad tcp checksum
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Sun, Chenmin
>
> From: Florin Coras
> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 12:04 AM
> To: Sun, Chenmin
> Cc: vpp-dev
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev
bad tcp checksum
Best Regards,
Sun, Chenmin
From: Florin Coras
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 12:04 AM
To: Sun, Chenmin
Cc: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP checksum behavior problems
Hi Chenmin,
Regarding your second question, some of the device drivers could mark buffers
for tx csum offl
Hi Chenmin,
Regarding your second question, some of the device drivers could mark buffers
for tx csum offload which is honored only if data is about to be delivered to
the network (or if some other action performed to the buffer requires csums to
be computed). Otherwise, if packets end up cons
[Edited Message Follows]
Hi experts,
I am confusing about the L4 checksum behavior in VPP. I noticed the code was
there for a very long time(more than 3 years) so I open this topic to see if
anybody knows the history and why.
* The first problem is in DPDK plugin and was introduced in commit d
Hi experts,
I am confusing about the L4 checksum behavior in VPP. I noticed the code was
there for a very long time(more than 3 years) so I open this topic to see if
anybody knows the history and why.
The first problem is in DPDK plugin and was introduced in commit d81566ff92:
Disable for-us u
