alf of Akash S R <
> akashsr.akas...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, October 19, 2021 at 11:03 AM
> *To: *Pim van Pelt
> *Cc: *vpp-dev , Ole Troan ,
> Dave Barach
> *Subject: *Re: [vpp-dev] VPP adding extra payload of 0's to packet in
> some node
>
>
>
> Hi
Barach
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP adding extra payload of 0's to packet in some node
Hi Pim,
This is the packet which was encapsulated with GTP Header and sent out of the
Interface.
Frame size received/below is 106. Why did NIC add 0's here ? Frame size without
0's is 90 > 64 ri
Hi Pim,
This is the packet which was encapsulated with GTP Header and sent out of
the Interface.
Frame size received/below is 106. Why did NIC add 0's here ? Frame size
without 0's is 90 > 64 right.
Thats why was suspecting VPP if it add's any extra 0'x based on flags or in
some node.
00 0
Hoi Akash,
You asked a similar question last week. Is it still the case that you're
describing a packet which is smaller than the 64b frame size described in
IEEE 802.3?
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet_frame and a rather informative
context at
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/comput
Hi Mates,
In my case, VPP is adding some 0's as extra payload onto the packet and
sending it out to NIC which is nearly 14 - 18 bytes. What is the node which
add's this ?
Or b0->flags is responsible for such case? Please help
/Akash
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent t
