On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:20 AM, Burt Silverman wrote:
>
> Perhaps Krishna could use a total of 2 VLANs rather than 2 VLANs per line
> card, and also think in terms of point to point rather than subnets. I
> have not thought through whether or how that helps hide the traffic
> splitting/load bal
Thank you, Ole. Great that you put this in the context of point to point
interfaces. But I think a fundamental issue remains -- one that Dave Barach
would remind me of, although I hope I do not misrepresent his question.
As I see it, one line card represents a router, and it has 2 point-to-point
i
Hi Krishna,
> Our product has multiple line cards and each line card has multiple
> interfaces. We run an instance of VPP on each line card. All of these
> interfaces are connected to a L2 switching network. A PE router is also
> connected to this L2 network for connectivity to internet.
>
>
Krishna,
I am almost certain that you want to stick with the VPP design, and that
you do not have a valid case for a design change.
Accept the fact that you have to add more VLANs/subnets to the PE router,
when, in fact, you have more VLANs/subnets
in your system.
It is possible to do what you ar
Our product has multiple line cards and each line card has multiple interfaces.
We run an instance of VPP on each line card. All of these interfaces are
connected to a L2 switching network. A PE router is also connected to this L2
network for connectivity to internet.
In order to explain this u
other IP destinations. -John
-Original Message-
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Dave Barach via
Lists.Fd.Io
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 2:37 PM
To: Andrew đź‘˝ Yourtchenko ; Burt Silverman
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Support for shared subnet
+1, see
arach (dbarach)
; krishnamurthy.m...@gmail.com; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Support for shared subnet
+1
Access point is 99.999% certainly bridging and if it doesn’t (e.g. openwrt
router config) the comment from Dave stands.
There are very corner cases scenarios that I vaguely remember
+1
Access point is 99.999% certainly bridging and if it doesn’t (e.g. openwrt
router config) the comment from Dave stands.
There are very corner cases scenarios that I vaguely remember like in cable
space (IIRC, don’t take it for granted/true) to limit the broadcast domain
without really spli
But Chris, I believe that wireless access point is using bridging -- not
the same thing. You probably can verify that by local log in to an ASUS
router or something else that uses Linux underneath, and double check me,
using ifconfig or ip commands.
Burt
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive
re
> not allowed.
>
> Please explain the use case in detail. Otherwise, we won’t be able to help.
>
> D.
>
> From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of
> krishnamurthy.m...@gmail.com
> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 10:56 AM
> To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> Su
@lists.fd.io
Subject: [vpp-dev] Support for shared subnet
Hi,
We have a use case where we'd like to configure IP addresses on multiple
interfaces in the same IP subnet. Currently this use case seems to be
unsupported in 18.10 version of Fd.Io. Is this feature supported in a more
cu
Hi,
We have a use case where we'd like to configure IP addresses on multiple
interfaces in the same IP subnet. Currently this use case seems to be
unsupported in 18.10 version of Fd.Io. Is this feature supported in a more
current version? If not, can you please provide me guidance on how I can
12 matches
Mail list logo
