Hi Ed,
Good idea. We will give it a try.
Thanks,
Hongjun
From: Ed Warnicke [mailto:hagb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 12:04 AM
To: Ni, Hongjun
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Li, Johnson
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Requirement on Load Balancer plugin for VPP
Hongjun,
Thinking it through
]
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 4:11 PM
To: Ni, Hongjun
Cc: Zhou, Danny ; Ed Warnicke ; Li,
Johnson ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Requirement on Load Balancer plugin for VPP
Le 25 avr. 2017 à 09:52, Ni, Hongjun
mailto:hongjun...@intel.com>> a écrit :
Hi Pierre,
For LB distri
and not allowed to expose to external network.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Hongjun
>
>
>
> *From:* Ed Warnicke [mailto:hagb...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 25, 2017 10:44 AM
> *To:* Ni, Hongjun
> *Cc:* vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Li, Johnson
> *Subject:* Re: [vpp-dev] Re
From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On
Behalf Of Thomas F Herbert
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 10:01 PM
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Requirement on Load Balancer plugin for VPP
On 04/25/2017 04:45 AM, Zhou, Danny wrote:
Thanks Pierre
@intel.com>>
*Cc:*Ni, Hongjun mailto:hongjun...@intel.com>>; Ed Warnicke mailto:hagb...@gmail.com>>; Li, Johnson mailto:johnson...@intel.com>>; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
*Subject:*Re: [vpp-dev] Requirement on Load Balancer plugin for
Complexity is quite a hard question to answer.
Waiting for your opinions, thanks!
Best Regards,
-Johnson
From: Ni, Hongjun
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 11:05 AM
To: Ed Warnicke
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Li, Johnson
Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] Requirement on Load Balancer plugin for VPP
Hi Ed,
Thanks
Thanks Pierre, comments inline.
From: Pierre Pfister (ppfister) [mailto:ppfis...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 4:11 PM
To: Ni, Hongjun
Cc: Zhou, Danny ; Ed Warnicke ; Li,
Johnson ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Requirement on Load Balancer plugin for VPP
Le 25 avr
-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io>
[mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Ni, Hongjun
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 11:05 AM
To: Ed Warnicke mailto:hagb...@gmail.com>>
Cc: Li, Johnson mailto:johnson...@intel.com>>;
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: Re
rce IP ->
AS’s IP, destination IP -> Client’s IP.
Thanks,
Hongjun
From: Pierre Pfister (ppfister) [mailto:ppfis...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 3:12 PM
To: Zhou, Danny
Cc: Ni, Hongjun ; Ed Warnicke ; Li,
Johnson ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Requirement on Load Balance
o:hagb...@gmail.com>>
Cc: Li, Johnson mailto:johnson...@intel.com>>;
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Requirement on Load Balancer plugin for VPP
Hi Ed,
Thanks for your prompt response.
This item is required to handle legacy AS, because some leg
-dev] Requirement on Load Balancer plugin for VPP
Hi Ed,
Thanks for your prompt response.
This item is required to handle legacy AS, because some legacy AS does not want
to change their underlay forwarding infrastructure.
Besides, some AS IPs are private and invisible outside the AS cluster
network.
Thanks,
Hongjun
From: Ed Warnicke [mailto:hagb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 10:44 AM
To: Ni, Hongjun
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Li, Johnson
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Requirement on Load Balancer plugin for VPP
Hongjun,
I can see this point of view, but it radically reduces the
Hongjun,
I can see this point of view, but it radically reduces the scalability of
the whole system.
Wouldn't it just make sense to run vpp or some other mechanism to decap the
GRE on whatever is running the other AS and feed whatever we are
load balancing to? Forcing back traffic through the cen
Hey,
Currently, traffic received for a given VIP (or VIP prefix) is tunneled using
GRE towards
the different ASs in a way that (tries to) ensure that a given session will
always be tunneled to the same AS.
But in real environment, many Application Servers do not support GRE feature.
So we raise
14 matches
Mail list logo
