arl Lei
> Sent: mercredi 9 mars 2022 11:21
> To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> Subject: Fw: [vpp-dev] Question on checksum offload in veth+AF_XDP
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 18:20:00 +0800
> From: Carl Lei
> To: "Benoit Ganne (bganne)
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 18:20:00 +0800
From: Carl Lei
To: "Benoit Ganne (bganne)"
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Question on checksum offload in veth+AF_XDP
Sorry, forgot to CC list.
Hi Benoit,
On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 09:45:58 +
"Benoit Ganne (bganne)"
/clicmd_src_vnet_devices_af_packet.html
With veth, AF_XDP and AF_PACKET should have similar performance anyway.
Best
ben
> -Original Message-
> From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Carl Lei
> Sent: mercredi 9 mars 2022 02:56
> To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> Subject: [vpp-dev] Question on c
Hello list,
I configured an address in the kernel on one side of veth and attached
the other side to VPP using AF_XDP, then I found that kernel-sent
packets into this veth pair would be forwarded by VPP without fixing
checksums. Kernel seems to believe the veth has checksum offload
features, well
