Dear Andrew,
Thanks for adding me to reviewer of the gerrit task, I checked my gerrit
account it's already reviewed and merged.
Thanks for such a fast response.
Cheers,
Soroosh
On Aug 10, 2017 8:20 PM, "Andrew 👽 Yourtchenko" wrote:
> Dear Soroosh,
>
> I have added you as a reviewer to https://
Dear Soroosh,
I have added you as a reviewer to https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7983/
--a
On 8/10/17, Andrew 👽 Yourtchenko wrote:
> Dear Soroosh,
>
> Thanks for catching, I think you are right!
>
> The assignment should come from curr_index rather than
> result_val->applied_entry_index..., and the
Dear Soroosh,
Thanks for catching, I think you are right!
The assignment should come from curr_index rather than
result_val->applied_entry_index..., and the non-shadowed check just
below will not apply, so would need to be deleted.
Before getting the fix in, let me see how I can enhance the unit
Dear vpp folks,
There is an ambiguity for me in 'multi_acl_match_get_applied_ace_index'
function in 'hash_lookup.c' when port-range check is true.
After finding an ace with matched port range, why we do not assign
curr_index to curr_match_index?
The following code snippet is the lines I refered a
