intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 2:56 PM
To: Dave Barach (dbarach) ; vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Fortville DPDK PMD: TCP checksum offload hassles
I have to admit that I did not know about this API until I saw your email and
had a chat with some folks about it.
>From my understan
nzalez Monroy [mailto:sergio.gonzalez.mon...@intel.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, June 22, 2017 1:08 PM
*To:* Dave Barach (dbarach) ; vpp-dev
*Subject:* Re: [vpp-dev] Fortville DPDK PMD: TCP checksum offload hassles
On 22/06/2017 16:11, Dave Barach (dbarach) wrote:
Folks,
I’m having a hard time trying to convince an In
nzalez Monroy [mailto:sergio.gonzalez.mon...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 1:08 PM
To: Dave Barach (dbarach) ; vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Fortville DPDK PMD: TCP checksum offload hassles
On 22/06/2017 16:11, Dave Barach (dbarach) wrote:
Folks,
I'm having a hard time trying to
On 22/06/2017 16:11, Dave Barach (dbarach) wrote:
Folks,
I’m having a hard time trying to convince an Intel Fortville (i40e)
PMD / NIC to compute and insert TCP correct TCP checksums.
In addition to the typical struct rte_mbuf setup, I add the following:
if (b->flags & VLIB_BUFFER_TCP_CHE
Folks,
I'm having a hard time trying to convince an Intel Fortville (i40e) PMD / NIC
to compute and insert TCP correct TCP checksums.
In addition to the typical struct rte_mbuf setup, I add the following:
if (b->flags & VLIB_BUFFER_TCP_CHECKSUM_OFFLOAD)
{
mb->packet_type =
