Hi Pim
This is very helpful.
I'll give it a try ASAP.
Dave's proposal to incubate thi project in FDio as a subproject makes sense
and I would be interested to follow up on that.
On Sat, Apr 2, 2022 at 5:18 PM Pim van Pelt wrote:
> Hoi colleagues,
>
> I know there exist several smaller and lar
over many use cases.
>
> I’ve not yet tried it but will certainly do it soon.
>
> Thanks !
>
> Jerome
>
>
>
> De : vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>> de la part de Pim van Pelt <mailto:p...@ipng.nl&g
ber Honeycomb…) and
> probably cover many use cases.
>
> I’ve not yet tried it but will certainly do it soon.
>
> Thanks !
>
> Jerome
>
>
>
> *De : *vpp-dev@lists.fd.io de la part de Pim van
> Pelt
> *Date : *samedi, 2 avril 2022 à 17:18
> *À : *vpp-dev
not yet tried it but will certainly do it soon.
Thanks !
Jerome
De : vpp-dev@lists.fd.io de la part de Pim van Pelt
Date : samedi, 2 avril 2022 à 17:18
À : vpp-dev
Objet : [vpp-dev] Feedback on a tool: vppcfg
Hoi colleagues,
I know there exist several smaller and larger scale VPP configuration
Hi Pim,
This is most excellent! Thank you for sharing your work.
I also have only taken a quick pass through the information you posted,
but have been thinking about tackling a YAML or JSON based configuration
format to help simplify the unit testing environment and make use case
test automa
Hi Pim,
Definitely cool! Haven’t had a chance to go through all of it but the fact that
some binary api calls crash vpp is something we should fix.
It feels like vppcfg could also be used for extensive vpp api/cli/cfg testing.
My quick 0.02$
Regards,
Florin
> On Apr 2, 2022, at 8:17 AM, Pi
Hoi colleagues,
I know there exist several smaller and larger scale VPP configuration
harnesses out there, some more complex and feature complete than others. I
wanted to share my work on an approach based on a YAML configuration with
strict syntax and semantic validation, and a path planner that
