Hi Maciek,
Couple of question.
1. Any idea why the bad plugins are bad - is there anything common in
their design that you suspect might be a common thread in the
performance regressions.
2. When I compare the CSIT 1710 to the 1801 test report from DPDK, it
suggests improved performance of
Update on the four rls1801 performance regressions reported in CSIT rls1801
report[1]:
1. CSIT-925 Plugin induced NDR/PDR regression
a. All plugins loaded (VPP default) shows throughput variability of 3..5% for
all NIC2NIC tests;
b. Initial regression tests isolated a group of 6 "bad" plugin
