On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 6:09 PM Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) via lists.fd.io
wrote:
> > Why do you say that vpp_papi need to be dual licensed?
>
>
>
> I think e-mail reply would be long,
>
> and I will need to address comments anyway,
>
> so I respond via a Gerrit ch
Vratko,
> > Why do you say that vpp_papi need to be dual licensed?
>
> I think e-mail reply would be long,
> and I will need to address comments anyway,
> so I respond via a Gerrit change [1].
I didn't understand the argument made in that patch. Two points for originality
regarding choice of to
