Can you provide the code? Personally, I would be interested in seeing your
approach.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11594): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11594
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/28718629/21656
Group Ow
Hi Klement.
Is there a way to write a test case that documents that behavior? Does the
test framework have the ability to split fragments across threads?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11583): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message
-1 on a completely new set of API function wrappers.
If I wanted to provide a means for backward compatibility, I would add a
NO_TYPE_CONVERSION_DEFAULT (although I like LEGACY_TYPE_CONVERSION_DEFAULT)
default value to the class instead of hardcoding the boolean and the consumer
can create a su
dhcp tests seem to be failing frequently, but inconsistently, passing on
subsequent retries.
An example can be seen in
https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-beta-verify-master-ubuntu1804/3998/console
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11550
Hi Ole.
I could see a use for having an API call that populates the properties of an
IntEnum.
Paul
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11520): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11520
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/2861011