Hi, Damjan,
My concern is even the cache for transmit thread is full, then buffer
will be return to the main pool, but the buffer in transmit thread cache will
not be freed or allocated any more. So it will be deposit in the transmit
thread cache.
BR/Lollita Liu
From: Damjan Marion
not recommended. Just want make
sure my understanding is right and nothing in buffer management mechanism has
ignored by me.
BR/Lollita Liu
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#12555): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/1
.flags = VLIB_BUFFER_NEXT_PRESENT,
.ref_count = ~1
};
BR/Lollita Liu
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#12503): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12503
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/30414067/21656
Group Owner:
Hi, Neale.
I have tested the fix, the crash can not be reproduced any more.
BR/Lollita Liu
From: Neale Ranns (nranns)
Sent: Friday, March 8, 2019 8:22 PM
To: Lollita Liu ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP crash when deleting route related with GTPU tunnel
endpoint
Hi
.
DBGvpp# ip route del 0.0.0.0/0 via 18.1.0.1
Thread 1 "lollita_main" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x775a4e1e in fib_entry_src_covered_inherit_add
(fib_entry=0x7ffdf5cd352c, source=FIB_SOURCE_RR)
at /home/vppshare/lollita/vpp-gerrit/vpp/src/vnet/fib/fib_entry
What is the usage of fib_entry_child_add related code?
BR/Lollita Liu
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#12440): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12440
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/30283902/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...
atch https://gerrit.fd.io/r/17600.
BR/Lollita Liu
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#12252): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12252
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/29836861/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscr
E] = 1;" in vpe_api_hookup, implying that
the VL_API_IP_ADD_DEL_ROUTE is mp_safe, but actually there is no
VL_API_IP_ADD_DEL_ROUTE in foreach_vpe_api_msg, and barrier_sync and
barrier_release still been called in debugging.
BR/Lollita Liu
;10. And the time cost has
been reduced to about one ninth of original result.
The question is what adj_nbr_tables is used for? Why it need so many buckets
and memory?
BR/Lollita Liu
Hi, Ole.
Thank you for update. I have do quick browse on the source code of
"punt socket", but what is your consider about supporting VRF?
BR/Lollita Liu
-Original Message-
From: Ole Troan [mailto:otr...@employees.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2018 6:35 PM
To: L
f "ip punt redirect"? Is there any standard
sample based on punt redirect?
In general, we have another question, is there any other method can fulfill our
requirement with VRF support in vpp?
BR/Lollita Liu
setup_tx_node (vm, hw->tx_node_index, dev_class);
+skip_add_node:
+
/* Call all up/down callbacks with zero flags when interface is created. */
vnet_sw_interface_set_flags_helper (vnm, hw->sw_if_index, /* flags */ 0,
VNET_INTERFACE_SET_FLAGS_HELP
Hi, John,
The internal mechanism is very clear to me now.
And do you have any thought about the dead lock on main thread?
BR/Lollita Liu
From: John Lo (loj) [mailto:l...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 11:18 AM
To: Lollita Liu ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Cc
you.
BR/Lollita Liu
-Original Message-
From: Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
[mailto:ksek...@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 8:26 PM
To: Lollita Liu ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Cc: Kingwel Xie ; Terry Zhang Z
; Jordy You
Subject: RE: Why is IP
l data
(3) Creating another 10K GTP tunnel
(4) Remove and Create the last 1K GTP tunnel repeatedly, with
10 seconds interval.
The result is 4.6Mpps@64B<mailto:4.6Mpps@64B>. Looks only the first time of GTP
tunnel creating w
could be quite large with certificate...
BR/Lollita Liu
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
16 matches
Mail list logo
