Yes, this patch has positive impact on perf on ICX. I mean that most of
changes in this patch is based on AVX512.
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Zhiyong Yang
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 6:27 PM
To: Jerome Tollet (jtollet) ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Damjan
Marion ; Paul Vinciguerra
Cc
Cc: Kinsella, Ray
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] l2: performance enhancement in l2output
Hello Zhiyong,
Have you measured performance impact of this patch ?
Jerome
De : mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>> au nom de Zhiyong Yang
mailto:zhiyong.y...@intel.com>>
Date : mercredi 8 juillet 2020 à 09
Hi Damjan, Paul and other VPP maintainers,
I have submitted the patch to accelerate the perf on XEON using avx512.
Please help review it. Thank you.
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/27213
BR
Zhiyong
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#169
Hi vpp/csit experts,
I have submitted one patch that tries to optimize l2 input node.
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/27191
Want to see if it can help enhance the perf or not. But don't how to trigger
the L2 BD perf test case on CSIT.
Who can help me about it ? Thanks a lot in advancement.
BR
Z
interface name.
-
Best Regards,
Sun, Chenmin
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
[mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Zhiyong Yang
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2019 12:39 PM
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Cc: rya...@yunify.c
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#14024): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/14024
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/34220878/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arc
Akshay,
I can access https://git.fd.io/ .
Thanks
Zhiyong
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Akshay Joshi
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 1:46 PM
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: [vpp-dev] Not able to access https://git.fd.io/ - Invalid certificate
Hi,
I am not able to able to access https://g
-dev@lists.fd.io>> on behalf of Zhiyong
Yang mailto:zhiyong.y...@intel.com>>
Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 at 10:33 PM
To: "Yang, Zhiyong" mailto:zhiyong.y...@intel.com>>,
"Steven Luong (sluong)" mailto:slu...@cisco.com>>,
"vpp-dev@lists.f
I mean, Is there no limit on the number of active-slaves as well?
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Zhiyong Yang
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2019 1:30 PM
To: Steven Luong (sluong) ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Carter,
Thomas N
Cc: Kinsella, Ray
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev
Thanks a lot, Steven.
Does it mean that all linkings(active-slaves in the same bonding group) of
negotiating successfully can join loading balance for TX in VPP , right?
Thanks
Zhiyong
From: Steven Luong (sluong) [mailto:slu...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2019 12:10 PM
To: Yang, Zhiyong
Hi Steven and VPP guys,
I'm studying the lacp implementation. and want to know if it is
possible that Numa is considered in LACP active port selection. As we all know,
if slave with local numa can be preferred to help improve throughput.
One question is that current code seems n
mailto:fcoras.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Did you try make wipe/wipe-release?
Florin
On May 16, 2019, at 7:45 PM, Zhiyong Yang
mailto:zhiyong.y...@intel.com>> wrote:
Hi guys,
Does anybody run into the trouble as below? How to fix it?
fatal error: quicly/defaults.h:
Hi guys,
Does anybody run into the trouble as below? How to fix it?
fatal error: quicly/defaults.h: No such file or directory
thanks
Zhiyong
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#13073): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/13073
Mute Th
Hi VPP experts,
I have submitted the below patch, welcome your comments.
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/19603/
bonding: add support for numa awareness
This patch enables binding numa awareness on multi-socket
server working in active-backeup mode.
The VPP adds capability for automatically preferring
Great to know that. Great Job! VPP Folks.
Zhiyong
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Florin Coras
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2019 6:13 AM
To: Dave Wallace
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; csit-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] VPP 19.04 Release is complete!
Awesome!
@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] One question about "worker-handoff" graph node.
Hmm, where I mentioned that?
On 26 Feb 2019, at 03:59, Zhiyong Yang
mailto:zhiyong.y...@intel.com>> wrote:
Damjan,
As you mentioned, worker-handoff is deprecated long ago in one previous emai
, 2019 6:54 PM
To: Yang, Zhiyong
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] One question about "worker-handoff" graph node.
It may be that just both doesn't work together, and a bit of TLC should be
applied...
On 21 Feb 2019, at 10:45, Zhiyong Yang
mailto:zhiyong.y...@in
orker-handoff" graph node.
On 20 Feb 2019, at 09:49, Zhiyong Yang
mailto:zhiyong.y...@intel.com>> wrote:
Hi VPP guys,
There exists a “handoff” graph node in VPP that is named
“worker-handoff”. From my understanding, it looks to be acting as a
distributing packets
Hi VPP guys,
There exists a "handoff" graph node in VPP that is named
"worker-handoff". From my understanding, it looks to be acting as a
distributing packets received role in the multi thread working environment ,
and distribute pkts by hash algo to 1 or more worker threads.
AES-CBC only.
Hope this helps.
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>> On Behalf Of Zhiyong Yang
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 7:15 PM
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: [vpp-dev] one question about VPP IP
Hi VPP expert,
When I look at the IPsec code，It looks that two implementations
coexists in VPP. One is dpdk IPsec, and another is native IPsec.
I wonder what’s difference between them from functionality perspective?
Any input is appreciated.
Regards
Zhiyong
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
CenOS 7.5
Hi Zhiyong,
There is :
make wipe-release
to clear out the files related to build-release
/neale
De : mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>> au nom de Zhiyong Yang
mailto:zhiyong.y...@intel.com>>
Date : vendredi 21 décembre 2018 à 06:00
À : Paul Vinciguerra
mailto:pvi...@vincico
s. This way we can setup the
necessary dependencies in the makefile.
/neale
De : Paul Vinciguerra
mailto:pvi...@vinciconsulting.com>>
Date : jeudi 20 décembre 2018 à 16:03
À : "Neale Ranns (nranns)" mailto:nra...@cisco.com>>
Cc : Ole Troan mailto:otr...@employees.org&
Ole,
In addition, the compiler that I’m using is gcc version 4.8.5
20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-36) (GCC)
Zhiyong
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Zhiyong Yang
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 6:15 PM
To: Ole Troan ; Damjan Marion
Cc: vpp-dev
Ole, Damjan,
It works well now. Thank you guys. I believe there should be no
problem for other OSes as well. ☺
Regards
Zhiyong
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Ole Troan
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 6:08 PM
To: Yang, Zhiyong
Cc: vpp-dev@li
Hi VPP guys,
Could you notice this building errors on CentOs as below? Could
anybody help fix it?
Regards
Zhiyong
Prefix path :
/opt/vpp/external/x86_64;/root/zhiyong/vpp/build-root/install-vpp-native/external
Install prefix : /root/zhiyong/vpp/build-root/install-v
tch includes this change.
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ pmalloc_map_pages (clib_pmalloc_main_t * pm,
clib_pmalloc_arena_t * a,
return 0;
}
- mmap_flags = MAP_FIXED;
+ mmap_flags = MAP_FIXED | MAP_ANONYMOUS;
Thanks
Zhiyong
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of
VATE;
+ mmap_flags |= MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS;
a->fd = -1;
}
I try to restore the first line changed. It works well on CentOS.
Thanks
Zhiyong
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Zhiyong Yang
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 6:11 PM
To: Damja
do mmap().
We need a bit more info, kernel version, kernel parameters,
Are you on the latest master?
--
Damjan
On 19 Nov 2018, at 10:25, Zhiyong Yang
mailto:zhiyong.y...@intel.com>> wrote:
Hi VPP dev guys,
Does Anybody see the failures about vpp on master branch as
fo
aster?
--
Damjan
On 19 Nov 2018, at 10:25, Zhiyong Yang
mailto:zhiyong.y...@intel.com>> wrote:
Hi VPP dev guys,
Does Anybody see the failures about vpp on master branch as
following? The failures must be reproduced on my 3 servers/boxes. How ca
Hi VPP dev guys,
Does Anybody see the failures about vpp on master branch as
following? The failures must be reproduced on my 3 servers/boxes. How can I
fix it ?
vlib_physmem_shared_map_create: pmalloc_map_pages: failed to mmap 1 pages at
0x7fd94000 fd 25 numa 0 flags 0x4
> -Original Message-
> From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Ole Troan
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 5:19 PM
> To: Yang, Zhiyong
> Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Kinsella, Ray ;
> hujie@chinatelecom.cn; Liu, Frank M
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] one questio
Ole,
Thank you for quick reply.
Reply inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Ole Troan
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 4:49 PM
> To: Yang, Zhiyong
> Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Kinsella, Ray ;
> hujie@chinatelecom.cn; Liu
Ole, thanks so much for your warm help.
> The next steps for tunnels, to help avoid fragmentation is to add some sort of
> tunnel path MTU discovery.
It looks very interesting and helpful. And I'm looking forward to seeing it.
However, we fail to send big packet greater than MTU now, for exampl
Hi Ole, VPP maintainers,
When I use vxlan in both VM and physical machine , packet drop
issue is come across, after setting VPP MTU = 1600, this issue will disappear.
As we all know, some of routes on the network doesn't support more than 1518
bytes packet.
Should I try to us
Hi Damjan, guys,
Agree with Damjan,
We can use new vectorized checksum calculation instead of VPP existing
implementation also.
For my local GRE tunnel testing case, the code can improve 10% or so throughput
on haswell as well.
Another patch is submitted as Damjan suggested.
using ip_csum in ip4
Dear Maciek,
I40e driver can support X710 and XL710, better for both if
possible, X710 is preferred.
feature set are expected as following:
1. Support jumbo frame by default. disable no-tx-checksum-offload and
no-multi-seg in the makefile
2. Enable faster vector pa
Hi damjan,
I try to post commit “csit-dev”, however nothing happens,
what’s wrong with me?
Thanks
Zhiyong
From: Damjan Marion [mailto:dmarion.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 5:52 PM
To: Yang, Zhiyong
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Kinsella, Ray ; csit-dev
Subject: Re
Thank you very much , Damjan.
From: Damjan Marion [mailto:dmarion.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 5:52 PM
To: Yang, Zhiyong
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Kinsella, Ray ; csit-dev
Subject: Re: How to trigger perf test and compare the results
+csit-dev
You can compare with numbers ava
Hi Guys,
I need CSIT perf testing to test patch.
I have known that vpp-verify-perf-l2 can trigger perf test, but I
only see the X520 results.
My questions are :
1. how to trigger XL710 perf test?
2. What do we compare it to ... have the nightly build results?
g DPDK patch in VPP.
http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/39154/
thanks
Zhiyong
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
[mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Zhiyong Yang
Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 1:36 PM
To: dmarion.li...@gmail.com<mailto:dmarion.li...@gmail.c
BTW,
Because I want to test the following DPDK patch in VPP.
http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/39154/
thanks
Zhiyong
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Zhiyong Yang
Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 1:36 PM
To: dmarion.li...@gmail.com
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Hi, folks,
I try to apply a dpdk makefile patch to add an option to dpdk
shared lib, how can I enable it in VPP ?
Thanks
Zhiyong
, Zhiyong
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] running VPP failed - clib_socket_init:
Thank you Zhiyong
it is already there
unix {
nodaemon
log /var/log/vpp/vpp.log
full-coredump
cli-listen /run/vpp/cli.sock
gid vpp
}
- Sara
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 5:01 AM, Zhiyong Yang
Hi Sara,
You can try to add the following configuration in the file
/etc/vpp/startup.conf, Maybe it can fix your issue.
unix {
cli-listen /run/vpp/cli.sock
}
Thanks
Zhiyong
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Sara Gittlin
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 11:27 PM
45 matches
Mail list logo
