Hi Stanislav,
Perhaps you are right (but from my point of view it is strange).
And I can suggest the following configuration. We don't use vpp at all:
# ip netns add vpp1
# ip netns add vpp2
# ip link add veth1 type veth peer name veth2
# ip link set veth1 netns vpp1
# ip link set veth2 netns v
Hello all,
I ran into a problem when working with l2/l3 cross connect.
For example, I create two *tap* interfaces in different network namespaces and
L2 cross-connect inside a vpp instance. Set up addresses - ping works.
But, if i delete the target namespace from the host - ping continues to wor
Hi Neale,
Thanks a lot, it really helped!
But I used:
enable ip6 interface memif0/0
in addition to:
set int unnumbered memif0/0 use loop0
Otherwise, ping from vpp2 to vpp1 doesn't work.
So, I moved on.
*Next problem*
If I use unnumbered IPv6 interface with a custom vrf table - ping doesn't
Yes, I try to ping from vpp1 to vpp2 via memif.
by the way, IPv4 works fine.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#20145): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/20145
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/85649127/21656
Group Owner: vpp-
Hello,
I have a problem - unnumbered IPv6 interface is not working.
*Configuration*
For example, let's create memifs, one of them will be IPv6 unnumbered.
*vpp1:*
>
>
>
> create interface memif id 0 master
> set int ip address memif0/0 fc00::1/120
> set int state memif0/0 up
>
>
*vpp2:*
Thank you, guys!
It seems to me that we additionally need this patch:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/33568
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#20011): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/20011
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/8
Hello,
Found a crash: if we add the route via fe80:: *after* the interface upping -
vpp crashes.
For example:
DBGvpp# create tap
tap0
DBGvpp# set int state tap0 up
DBGvpp# ip route add fa::1/120 via fe80::1 tap0
make: *** [Makefile:537: run] Aborted
If we swap *set ... up* and *ip route ..
Hello,
Found a problem with some types of interfaces.
For example, memif. When I'm creating memif interfaces and run ping I see:
DBGvpp# ping 10.10.2.1
Failed: no source address for egress interface
...
But it is worth mentioning that I am setting /32 mask for IP address
Managed to fix IP mode
Ole,
I don't fully understand,
If I want to support configurable UDP port per tunnel, I need to extend
"vxlan_tunnel_t" or "vxlan_gpe_tunnel_t" or "vxlan_gbp_tunnel_t" or all of
them. So this is what I meant in point 2. Why 2.5? :)
Or can I only use the "vxlan_gbp_tunnel_t" for this purpose?
Th
Hi everyone,
I want to discuss the enhancement of VxLAN.
As we know VxLAN supports only 4789 udp-port (IANA standard).
What if we expand on the current implementation and let the user choose the
port he wants to?
I have some thoughts on this.
*1.* Add an additional nodes in existing feature if
Good morning.
I'm writing a plugin with tunnel encryption.
I have a question. For example, in the middle of the data encrypting we decided
that we need to update client-server keys. How to stop (start wait) data flow
before i-th packet, for request-receive keys from server and continue encrypt
Hello.
I'm want to make plugin for Wireguard tunnel.
Wireguard has a handshake procedure. It occurs every few minutes.
I have a question: is it possible to make this procedure in a vpp plugin? Can i
see similar examples/ideas somewhere?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent
12 matches
Mail list logo
