Re: [vpp-dev] Slow VPP performance vs. DPDK l2fwd / l3wfd

``` ### L2fwd config based on MAC ### - version: 2 interfaces: ['4b:00.0', '4b:00.1'] port_info: - dest_mac: b8:ce:f6:dc:xx:xx src_mac:  b8:ce:f6:dc:xx:xx - dest_mac: b8:ce:f6:dc:xx:xx src_mac:  b8:ce:f6:dc:xx:xx platform: master_thread_id: 0 latency_thread_id: 1 dual_if: - socket: 0 threads: [2

Re: [vpp-dev] Slow VPP performance vs. DPDK l2fwd / l3wfd

Adding also the TRex config: ### Config file generated by dpdk_setup_ports.py ### - version: 2 interfaces: ['4b:00.0', '4b:00.1'] port_info: - dest_mac: b8:ce:f6:dc:e1:f0 src_mac: b8:ce:f6:dc:e1:e8 - dest_mac: b8:ce:f6:dc:e1:f1 src_mac: b8:ce:f6:dc:e1:e9 platform: master_thread_id: 0 latency_thr

[vpp-dev] Slow VPP performance vs. DPDK l2fwd / l3wfd

  Hi VPP team,   need to wrap my head around why VPP is not even able to process 10 Mpps one single-core setup.  Afaik VPP xconnect ( comparable to l2fwd) or L3-routing ( l3wfd) should yield 10 Mpps even back in 2017 (  slide 15 https://wiki.fd.io/images/3/31/Benchmarking-sw-data-planes-Dec5_

Re: [vpp-dev] LoadBalancer SCTP Support

Seems like that vpp/src/plugin/cnat can support sctp, commit f284c14c7bd8731367ba3527cdfffa610a8c6de4 Author: Nathan Skrzypczak nathan.skrzypc...@gmail.com Date: Wed Feb 2 19:31:58 2022 +0100 cnat: Add sctp support This patch adds SCTP support in th