ok, then just don’t do it until problem is properly addressed in i40e.
—
Damjan
On 07.10.2021., at 14:03, Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco)
mailto:pmi...@cisco.com>> wrote:
vpp_device, a.k.a functional per patch testing in volume.
Peter Mikus
Engineer – Software
Cisco Sys
vpp_device, a.k.a functional per patch testing in volume.
Peter Mikus
Engineer – Software
Cisco Systems Limited
From: Damjan Marion (damarion)
Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2021 14:02
To: Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco)
Cc: Juraj Linkeš;
I don't think using vlans in performance testbeds is good idea.
I would simply avoid using it…
—
Damjan
On 07.10.2021., at 13:58, Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco)
mailto:pmi...@cisco.com>> wrote:
This effectively means to me decommission of vpp_device testing on Fortville
This effectively means to me decommission of vpp_device testing on Fortville,
due to absent of support (API, switch, whatever...).
Vlan is fundamental feature of isolating the traffic into VFs in multitenant
environments. It is clear from [0]
//quote
If you have applications that require Virtual
> On 07.10.2021., at 13:22, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Juraj Linkeš
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 11:43 AM
>> To: damar...@cisco.com
>> Cc: vpp-dev ; Lijian Zhang
>> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] AVF interface creation f
> -Original Message-
> From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Juraj Linkeš
> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 11:43 AM
> To: damar...@cisco.com
> Cc: vpp-dev ; Lijian Zhang
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] AVF interface creation fails on VFs with configured
> VLAN
> with newer i40e drivers
>
> This is the code snippet from DPDK 19.11 i40evf PMD on setting mtu
> which would fail if port/device is already started. Does vppctl set
> interface mtu command stops, sets mtu and then starts the device or is
> this NIC specific? What is the approach or advice dealing with NIC
> specific limitat
Hi,
To confirm it is a IPv6 ND issue you can try to add a static neighbor entry
with eg. 'ip neighbor loop0 10::2 1.2.3'.
If that fixes the issue, you can then try to capture traffic when it happens
and analyzes what is going with IPv6 ND, to understand whether it is a VPP
issue or an issue wit
