> On 17 Sep 2020, at 23:55, Venkat wrote:
>
>
>
>> 2. What happens when ACL config is modified while traffic is flowing? Would
>> the packets continue to hit the special-case "-1" session until the session
>> is timed out and re-claimed? If that's true, then packets would continue to
>> s
2. What happens when ACL config is modified while traffic is flowing? Would
the packets continue to hit the special-case "-1" session until the session
is timed out and re-claimed? If that's true, then packets would continue to
sneak through even when a user modifies the ACL from Permit+Reflect to
> On 17 Sep 2020, at 21:21, Venkat wrote:
>
>
> Thanks, Andrew,
>
> And I noticed that sessions get deleted/reclaimed when ACL is disassociated
> from the interface to which it was attached prior.
> Maybe that's one option to have ACL detach and reattach to the interface when
> there is
Thanks, Andrew,
And I noticed that sessions get deleted/reclaimed when ACL is disassociated
from the interface to which it was attached prior.
Maybe that's one option to have ACL detach and reattach to the interface
when there is any modification to the ACL to have immediately expected
behavior in
> On 17 Sep 2020, at 19:29, Venkat wrote:
>
>
> Andrew,
>
> I have a few follow up questions on the stated behavior.
>
> 1. Does the behavior you outlined about hitting special-case "-1" entries
> apply to UDP traffic as well if the ACL rule is stateful?
Yup.
>
> 2. What happens when
Andrew,
I have a few follow up questions on the stated behavior.
1. Does the behavior you outlined about hitting special-case "-1" entries
apply to UDP traffic as well if the ACL rule is stateful?
2. What happens when ACL config is modified while traffic is flowing? Would
the packets continue to
> On 17 Sep 2020, at 14:59, hem...@mnkcg.com wrote:
>
>
> I haven’t planned auto-generation of test_xxx.py yet.
>
> Looking at test_cdp.py, I see lot of python code which should be common to
> most plugin PTF tests. Thereafter, creating a good and bad packet for a
> protocol., enabling/di
Hi Filip,
Sounds good.
Thanks!
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 1:27 AM Filip Varga -X (fivarga - PANTHEON TECH SRO
at Cisco) wrote:
> Hi Pac,
>
>
>
> Yes the idea is that you should be able to ping NAT outside interface from
> the adjacent side of the connection. This was previously working. I will
>
Dear Dave,
It is not surprise to me as we already spoke about this several times.
I’m glad that you decided to stay with us and help this project grow, even
after you step down from the PTL role.
As you said, we need to elect new PTL, and I would like to nominate myself.
If I am elected, I know
Dave:
Wow...I'm starting to wonder what the community would do without you, but
grateful to hear you'll remain active.
You have been "the" foundation of FD.io wrt VPP since the inception (and of
course for many more years when VPP was solely software within Cisco.)
Your leadership and contribu
> I'm trying to build from source vpp (v18.04) on ubuntu 18.04, but still no
> luck. Compilation throws errors. I've got the same error with vpp v18.10
> too
> Could anybody help me with compilation ?
I bet you are missing build dependencies, see
https://fd.io/vppproject/vppbuilding/
In short, Yo
Folks,
Im departing the employment rolls towards the end of next month. Although I
intend to remain active in the fd.io vpp community as a coder, committer,
and resident greybeard, its time for the community to pick a new PTL.
According to the project governance document,
https://fd.io/docs/ts
I haven’t planned auto-generation of test_xxx.py yet.
Looking at test_cdp.py, I see lot of python code which should be common to most
plugin PTF tests. Thereafter, creating a good and bad packet for a protocol.,
enabling/disabling plugin should be straightforward to auto-generate. I think,
Hi All,
We are integrating a *Linux pthread* with a *vpp thread* and are looking
for a *lockless queue/ring buffer implementation* that can be used.
In vpp infra i could see fifo and ring. But not sure if they can be used
for enqueue/dequeue from a pthread that VPP is not aware off.
Do you have an
Hi Pac,
Yes the idea is that you should be able to ping NAT outside interface from the
adjacent side of the connection. This was previously working. I will create a
ticket for the issue and look in to it shortly.
If you have any other issues with NAT please let me know.
Best regards,
Filip
Fr
Hi all,
The VPP 20.09 RC2 milestone is complete. The artifacts are available
on packagecloud: https://packagecloud.io/app/fdio/2009/search?q=rc2
Our next milestone is on Wednesday 23rd, according to the release plan [0].
As a reminder: this release we have an extra milestone to avoid having
the
Hi Dave,Thanks for tip. I enabled feature on the rx interface. It worked.
ThanksSam M
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020, 04:16:07 AM PDT, Dave Barach via
lists.fd.io wrote:
#yiv9801683627 #yiv9801683627 -- _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered
{}#yiv9801683627 #yiv9801683627 p.yiv9801683627M
17 matches
Mail list logo
