I'm not sure who this should go to, nor the impact, so I'm posting it here.
vpp-merge-master-centos7 is failing due to libmemif and [ -Wstringop-overflow=]
see [0].
[0]
https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/vpp-merge-master-centos7/9496/console.log.gz
(
https://logs.fd.io/produc
Hi Raj,
There are no explicit vcl apis that allow a udp listener to be switched to
connected mode. We might decide to do this at one point through a new bind api
(non-posix like) since we do support this for builtin applications.
However, you now have the option of connecting a bound session.
Yes. It fixes the issue.
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:28 PM Florin Coras wrote:
> Hi Chuan,
>
> Does this [1] fix the issue?
>
> Regards,
> Florin
>
> [1] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/27103
>
> On May 15, 2020, at 4:24 PM, Chuan Han via lists.fd.io <
> chuanhan=google@lists.fd.io> wrote:
>
>
Hi Chuan,
Does this [1] fix the issue?
Regards,
Florin
[1] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/27103
> On May 15, 2020, at 4:24 PM, Chuan Han via lists.fd.io
> wrote:
>
> The following patch is very suspicious.
>
> * a58be82dd vlib: fix unix cli commands crash without session
>
> vppctl works
The following patch is very suspicious.
* a58be82dd vlib: fix unix cli commands crash without session
vppctl works fine at: * 0ef915398 (HEAD) ikev2: use u32 in unformat
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:07 PM Chuan Han via lists.fd.io wrote:
> Hi, vpp team,
>
> It seems vppctl is broken on the maste
Hi Andrew,
“
An API that is not touched during a "make test" can not be moved
beyond the "in-progress" status. Adding the unit test implies the
commitment from the API contributor to follow the option (5) above
even for "trivial endianness bugs".
“
Absolutely essential! More so, after a
Thanks! Florin,
OK, I understood that I need to change my application to use UDP socket and
then use vppcom_session_connect().
This is fine for the UDP client ( sender) .
But ,in UDP Server ( receiver) , I am not sure how to use the
vppcom_session_connect(). .
I am using vppcom_session_listen()
Hi, vpp team,
It seems vppctl is broken on the master head: 18a86c6e6 g2: fix the g2
build for Ubuntu 20.04
The broken functionality is vppctl single command mode: sudo vppctl
host# vppctl
srv-2-vpp# sh ver
vpp v20.09-rc0~15-g18a86c6e6 built by root on host at 2020-05-15T15:31:41
srv-2-vpp# qui
Hi Raj,
We removed udpc transport in vpp. I’ll push a patch that removes it from vcl as
well.
Calling connect on a udp connection will give you connected semantics now. Let
me know if that solves the issue for you.
Regards,
Florin
> On May 15, 2020, at 12:15 PM, Raj Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi,
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 2:38 PM Jon Loeliger wrote:
>
> So, here is the same scenario using vppctl to set up the test case.
>
> vpp# nat44 add static mapping icmp local 192.168.0.53 external outside
> vpp# show nat44 static mappings
> NAT44 static mappings:
> local 192.168.0.53 external 192.168.
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:23 AM Jon Loeliger via lists.fd.io wrote:
> Did the ICMP mapping open more than was expected or intended here?
>
> I chased this down in the code a bit, but I'm not sure what the _intent_
> is supposed to be.
> When "address only" is true (ie, both ports are 0), then th
I chimed in initially, because admittedly, I am usually the one breaking
the api, (with Vratko telling me to stop breaking CSIT ;/ ) and I learned a
lot in the process.
1. The thing we don't have today that would have caught these endian issues
are api tests.
a. Send in a create and verify all t
Hi,
I am getting segmentation fault in VPP when using VCL VPPCOM_PROTO_UDP *C*
socket. This issue is observed with both UDP sender and UDP receiver
application.
However, both UDP sender and receiver works fine with VPPCOM_PROTO_UDP.
Here is the stack trace -
(gdb) bt
#0 0x in
Greetings LFN Technical Community,
We wanted to make sure that you had the new format and dates for the
upcoming LFN Developer & Testing Forum on your radar. The event was
originally planned for the first week of June but has now been scheduled
for June 22 - 25. Like the LFN Technical Meetings in
If I read you correctly, this bug went unnoticed, but has never seen an LTS
release. LTS might be the only release people are actually developing products
with. :)
I also sent some mail about brokenness in the auto-generated endian functions.
I noticed this while I was investigating a post 19.0
As Neale replied earlier, adding L3 addr to the interface should implicitly
enable arp on it.
Thanks!
--
Regards,
Balaji.
From: Mrityunjay Kumar
Date: Friday, May 15, 2020 at 7:19 AM
To: "Balaji Venkatraman (balajiv)"
Cc: Laurent Dumont , vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP - DPDK - No ARP l
There's a very interesting couple of gerrit changes that just came in
today that is worth discussing,
and they are a perfect case study to further clarify the process - so
I tweaked the subject accordingly..
The API message itself is relatively minor, but regardless of what is
agreed that makes a g
Hi Balaji
Its working for me. I was just trying to help "Laurent Dumont"
--
@Laurent Dumont , can try it, even this arp
issue, is it working for you if you are adding neghbor IP?
set ip neighbor set ip neighbor [del]
[static] [no-fib-entry] [count ] [fib-id
] [prox
Hi Laurent,
ARP is enabled on an interface once it is assigned an IP address or is made
unnumbered to another. You can check that ARP is enabled with:
sh int feat VirtualFunctionEthernet0/5/0.101
and you won’t see ‘arp-disabled’ as a feature on the arp arc.
I suspect you are not receiving pac
Hi Mrityunjay,
Could you try adding an ip route and recheck.
I think ARP is enabled once ip routing is enabled.
Thanks
--
Regards,
Balaji.
From: on behalf of Laurent Dumont
Date: Friday, May 15, 2020 at 4:57 AM
To: Mrityunjay Kumar
Cc: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP - DPDK - No ARP l
Hi everyone!
Thank you for the tips
The VF is created with the Trust On and spoofcheck disabled during the
instance creation.
vf 18 MAC fa:16:3e:92:30:f1, spoof checking off, link-state auto, trust on
I had a change to test this a bit more. It looks like the issue is
specifically with passing t
Hi Neale,
Sorry about the trace.
The match in the SPD is against SA 20’s tunnel addresses not the policy’s
> local/remote range.
Thanks for clarifying this. I was confused here.
I created the SA and policy with this in mind and got it to work
successfully.
Thanks a lot for your help.
I will s
22 matches
Mail list logo
