[vpp-dev] SRv6 Policy Yang Changes according to latest IETF-draft

Hi, We have been trying to test SRv6 policy configuration on VPP through hc2vpp. As I browsed through the SRv6 yang files implemented in hc2vpp project, I observed that the last commit was made on Jan 13,2019. Since then, changes has been made in the standard ietf-draft version of srv6 policy ya

[vpp-dev] Edit RPC returns RPC-OK but commit fails for SRv6 policy configuration

Hi, Our use case involves VPP SRv6 policy configuration using hc2vpp. I have installed hc2vpp (v19.04) on my local machine and using the hc2vpp yang files for SRv6 (path : hc2vpp ( https://github.com/FDio/hc2vpp/tree/234cbb30b9942310dde10700c47354e343312ef7 ) / srv6 ( https://github.com/FDio/h

Re: [vpp-dev] Nested structure in vpp api file.

Hi Himanshu, > Thanks for the reply. With the reference I was able to create nested > structure in .api file. > > BTW what do you mean by we support only a single VLA? In any message, including a nested one, only one field can be of variable length. That field must be last in the message. Th

Re: [vpp-dev] Issue coming while fib lookup in vpp 18.01 between /8 and default route

Thanks Neale for response. I will take a look. On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 2:58 PM Neale Ranns (nranns) wrote: > > > 18.01 might be missing patches in ip4_mtrie.c. > > > > /neale > > > > *From: * on behalf of chetan bhasin < > chetan.bhasin...@gmail.com> > *Date: *Friday 31 January 2020 at 11:47 > *T

Re: [vpp-dev] Nested structure in vpp api file.

Hi Ole, Thanks for the reply. With the reference I was able to create nested structure in .api file. BTW what do you mean by *we support only a single VLA?* Thanks & Regards Himanshu On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 18:44, wrote: > Himanshu, > > > I want to write a vpp plugin. I take the sample-plugin a

Re: [vpp-dev] Build jobs failure with No problems were identified. If you know why this problem occurred, please add a suitable Cause for it.

Hi Klement Sekera, Thank you for your inputs. I am able to reproduce the issue at my end, I will look into it. == ERROR: test_quic_int_transfer (test_quic.QUICEchoIntTransferTestCase) -

Re: [vpp-dev] interface activation problem using VPP in Azure with DPDK failsafe interfaces #vpp #dpdk #azure

Ben, Here is the output you requested - I haven't really tested things yet, but the devices seem to attach and the hardware says it's up! I think you were right about running with LD_LIBRARY_PATH in the same runtime environment! There are still some concerning error messages, but not sure that

[vpp-dev] Coverity run FAILED as of 2020-02-03 14:00:24 UTC

Coverity run failed today. Current number of outstanding issues are 2 Newly detected: 0 Eliminated: 0 More details can be found at https://scan.coverity.com/projects/fd-io-vpp/view_defects -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#15316): ht

Re: [vpp-dev] Build jobs failure with No problems were identified. If you know why this problem occurred, please add a suitable Cause for it.

Hi Click the first link -> console output -> show all You’ll see test failures. You can run locally these tests by invoking “make test”. Once fixed, reupload your change. HTH..Klement > On 3 Feb 2020, at 14:44, Shiva Shankar wrote: > > Hi everyone, > I am seeing below error messages during

[vpp-dev] Build jobs failure with No problems were identified. If you know why this problem occurred, please add a suitable Cause for it.

Hi everyone, I am seeing below error messages during job execution. Any inputs on error message? Issued "recheck" multiple times, but no luck. fd.io JJB Patch Set 1: Build Failed https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-master-ubuntu1804/1947/ : FAILURE No problems were identified. If you know why

Re: [vpp-dev] Nested structure in vpp api file.

Himanshu, > I want to write a vpp plugin. I take the sample-plugin as a reference. I am > facing an issue while creating a nested structure in the .api file. > > What is the proper way of defining nested structure in the .api file. Look at e.g. ip.api or ip_types.api as examples. Note that we

[vpp-dev] Nested structure in vpp api file.

Hi All, I want to write a vpp plugin. I take the sample-plugin as a reference. I am facing an issue while creating a nested structure in the .api file. What is the proper way of defining nested structure in the .api file. Thanks, Himanshu -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages

[vpp-dev] disable flow control packet

Hi all, How to disable flow control packets on vpp interface. Regards Muthukumar S -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#15311): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/15311 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/70943390/21656 Group Owne

Re: [vpp-dev] issue with ARP and classify packet forwarding #classify

Hi Po, From: on behalf of Po Date: Friday 24 January 2020 at 08:14 To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Subject: [vpp-dev] issue with ARP and classify packet forwarding #classify Hi, I would like to classify the packet and forward to desired destination - Classify hits the rules - ARP proxy enabled Ex

Re: [vpp-dev] Issue coming while fib lookup in vpp 18.01 between /8 and default route

18.01 might be missing patches in ip4_mtrie.c. /neale From: on behalf of chetan bhasin Date: Friday 31 January 2020 at 11:47 To: vpp-dev Subject: [vpp-dev] Issue coming while fib lookup in vpp 18.01 between /8 and default route Hello Everyone, I know that vpp 18.01 is not supported furthe