[Edited Message Follows]
As the subject indicates, I am having difficulty getting my VPP interfaces
activating properly. I am trying to use DPDK-enabled netvsc devices with VPP in
Ubuntu 18.04 in Azure.
I am trying to follow this guide:
https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/How_To_Connect_A_PCI_Interfac
Hi Chris,
We see ‘carrier down’ on the FailsafeEthernet0. What is the remote end to this
interface? Could you confirm that is up as well?
vpp# show hardware
NameIdx Link Hardware
FailsafeEthernet0 1down FailsafeEthernet0
Link speed: 10 G
As the subject indicates, I am having difficulty getting my VPP interfaces
activating properly. I am trying to use DPDK-enabled netvsc devices with VPP in
Ubuntu 18.04 in Azure.
I am trying to follow this guide:
https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/How_To_Connect_A_PCI_Interface_To_VPP
Here is some bas
The moral of the story here is ‘only madmen/people run pip —upgrade pip in a
script and expect the wheels to not fly off’
Obviously the LF has not learned this lesson enough. (But with the release of
pip 20.0.0 yesterday it was another reminder)
On getting to root cause ive opened a ticket agai
I'm currently building new images for FD.io. Do any of your projects
have a requirement for OpenSuse Jenkins executors?
Thank you,
Vanessa
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#15229): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/15229
Mute This
Hi Neale,
Can you not also do:
comment { ingress direction }
set interface feature loop0 ip4-lookup arc ip4-unicast disable
comment { egress direction }
set interface feature loop0 arp-reply arc arp disable
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 12:16 PM Neale Ranns via Lists.Fd.Io wrote:
>
>
> hi,
>
>
>
Great! Thanks, Ed!
Florin
> On Jan 22, 2020, at 9:22 AM, Ed Kern (ejk) wrote:
>
>
> florin this should be ok now on all branches….
>
> Vanessa changed the publisher which worked around the problem.
>
>
> (The underlying problem with lftools and their use of pip flags which dont
> jibe with
The IP lookup failed on the decapped packet, there’s no route to 60.60.0.100 in
fib index 1 – which I assume is table 1. You can check which table it is with:
sh ip fib index 1 summary
I’m not familiar with UPF so I can’t tell you why the lookup was done that way.
/neale
From: on behalf of
florin this should be ok now on all branches….
Vanessa changed the publisher which worked around the problem.
(The underlying problem with lftools and their use of pip flags which dont jibe
with the latest pip release version
is still open but shouldn’t be hitting us.)
Ed
> On Jan 22, 202
Hello,
May I get help on interpreting the error of null-node: blackholed packets.
I'm sending ICM packet with src(60.60.0.1) and dst (60.60.0.100) address
over GTP tunnel(172.21.0.1 -> 172.30.1.2).
The corresponding GTP packet is blackholed. In my understanding, VPP does
not know where to send. In
hi,
to enables IP4 forwarding on an interface, either apply an address or make it
unnumberered to another interface (that has an address);
set int ip addr
set int unnumbered use
to enables IP4 forwarding on an interface, either apply an address or enable
ip6 on it.
set int ip addr
I am looking into this for the last 30 minutes or so and have raised it with LF
folks as well.
More hopefully soon.
Ed
> On Jan 22, 2020, at 8:28 AM, Florin Coras wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> All verify jobs are now failing because of these. “lftools command not found”
> seems to be the issue bu
Hi,
All verify jobs are now failing because of these. “lftools command not found”
seems to be the issue but not the only error.
Could somebody take a look at them?
Regards,
Florin-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#15221): https://
Yes, agree with you.
Here I got a thought about handoff mechanism in vPP. If looking into the DPDK
crypto scheduler, you will find out that it heavily depends on DPDK rings, for
buffer delivery among CPU cores and even for the packet reordering. Therefore,
something comes to my mind, why can
Coverity run failed today.
Current number of outstanding issues are 3
Newly detected: 0
Eliminated: 0
More details can be found at
https://scan.coverity.com/projects/fd-io-vpp/view_defects
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#15219): ht
May I know if VPP has any command to individually enable/disable ip forwarding
per interface level.
Thanks
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#15218): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/15218
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/6
16 matches
Mail list logo
