Re: [vpp-dev] How to configure network between different namespaces using hoststack

Hi Florin, Okay, regarding first question,  the following is the detailed use case:I have one 82599 nic in my Linux host. Then I allocate two VF interfaces through SRIOV,  one VF place into a Linux namespace N1 and assign IP address 192.168.1.2/24, another VF place into V

[vpp-dev] Should the inactive slave of a bond(active-backet mode) handler incoming packets? #vapi #vnet #vpp

Hi: I met this problem: - TenGigabitEthernet3b/0/1(active) --- | port a       port c  | *VTEP* (vxlan)--- *bridge domain* -- *BondEthernet0* --- /                                                                                       |        switch          | \___ TenGigab

Re: [vpp-dev] Did anything ever make vpp's native ipsec stack (ia32) work with dpdk/phy nic?

Hi Chuan, You need to specify salt for GCM to work in static config. i.e. ipsec sa add 1 spi 255129 esp crypto-key 0123456789012345678901234567890101234567890123456789012345678901 crypto-alg aes-gcm-256 salt 0x12345678 LMK if this helps... -- Damjan > On 27 Nov 2019, at 15:16, Chuan Han

Re: [vpp-dev] How to configure network between different namespaces using hoststack

Hi Hanlin, Inline. > On Dec 4, 2019, at 1:59 AM, wanghanlin wrote: > > Hi Florin， > > Thanks for your patient reply. Still I have some doubt inline. > > > wanghanlin > > wanghan...@corp.netease.com > >

Re: [vpp-dev] efficient use of DPDK

> > > > Actually native drivers (like Mellanox or AVF) can be faster w/o buffer > > conversion and tend to be faster than when used by DPDK. I suspect VPP > is > not > > the only project to report this extra cost. > It would be good to know other projects that report this ext

Re: [vpp-dev] efficient use of DPDK

inlined Le 05/12/2019 09:03, « vpp-dev@lists.fd.io au nom de Honnappa Nagarahalli » a écrit : > -Original Message- > From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Jerome Tollet via > Lists.Fd.Io > Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2019 9:33 AM > To: tho...@monjalon.

Re: [vpp-dev] vector size issue with Multi threaded VPP

Hi Satya, Can you share the output of “sh runtime” and “sh int rx placement”? Also, what does sh trace says? Shiva Shiva On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 at 20:59, Satya Murthy wrote: > Retrying my luck once again. > > Hi, > > We are facing a strange problem when we moved from single worker to multi > wo

Re: [vpp-dev] efficient use of DPDK

> -Original Message- > From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Jerome Tollet via > Lists.Fd.Io > Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2019 9:33 AM > To: tho...@monjalon.net > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] efficient use of DPDK > > Actually native drivers (like Mellanox or AVF)

[vpp-dev] vector size issue with Multi threaded VPP

Retrying my luck once again. Hi, We are facing a strange problem when we moved from single worker to multi worker VPP. Our application plugin registers for a specific udp port and gets the packets from udp_local node. In Single Worker VPP: We see that our app-plugin-node

[vpp-dev] Coverity run FAILED as of 2019-12-05 14:00:26 UTC

Coverity run failed today. Current number of outstanding issues are 2 Newly detected: 0 Eliminated: 1 More details can be found at https://scan.coverity.com/projects/fd-io-vpp/view_defects -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#14811): ht

[vpp-dev] Should the packets input frome the backup slave member of a bond interface( the bond's mode is "active-backup") be processed in graph nodes? #vnet # #vpp

[Edited Message Follows] * As mentioned in the topic. I use VPP's stable version 19.08 and do some config like this: 1. I create a bond interface and set bond mode as “active-backup”； 2. I add two phy port in bond as bond’s slavies; 3. I set all of the three interface up; after do these config

[vpp-dev] Should the packets input frome the backup slave member of a bond interface( the bond's mode is "active-backup") be processed in graph nodes? #vnet # #vpp

* As mentioned in the topic. I use VPP's stable version 19.08 and do some config like this: 1. I create a bond interface and set bond mode as “active-backup”； 2. I add two phy port in bond as bond’s slavies; 3. I set all of the three interface up; after do these configures, I run " *show bond d

Re: [vpp-dev] CSIT - performance tests failing on Taishan

Hi Lijian, The patch helped, I can't reproduce the issue now. Thanks, Juraj -Original Message- From: Lijian Zhang (Arm Technology China) Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2019 7:16 AM To: Juraj Linkeš ; Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco) ; Benoit Ganne (bganne) ; Maciek K