Hi Hanlin,
Inline.
> On Nov 29, 2019, at 7:12 AM, wanghanlin wrote:
>
> Hi Florin,
> Thanks for your reply.
> I just consider a very simple use case. Some apps in different containers
> communicate through VPP, just in a L2 bridge domain.
> Without hoststack, we may add some host-interfac
Hi Florin,
Thanks for your reply.
I just consider a very simple use case. Some apps in different containers
communicate through VPP, just in a L2 bridge domain.
Without hoststack, we may add some host-interfaces in one bridge domain, and
assign IP address of veth interface in containers. In addi
Hi Peter, can I get access to the setup to investigate?
Best
ben
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco)
>
> Sent: vendredi 29 novembre 2019 11:08
> To: Benoit Ganne (bganne) ; Juraj Linkeš
> ; Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan)
> ; vpp-dev ; csit
DPDK is statically linked into dpdk plugin (dpdk_plugin.so).
--
Damjan
> On 29 Nov 2019, at 06:50, wei_sky2...@163.com wrote:
>
>
> We think VPP uses DPDK for data receive from nic, but it seems no dpdk lib
> exist in vpp project.
> we also try to use readelf to check the libs used by vpp,
+dev lists
Peter Mikus
Engineer - Software
Cisco Systems Limited
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco)
> Sent: Friday, November 29, 2019 11:06 AM
> To: Benoit Ganne (bganne) ; Juraj Linkeš
> ; Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan)
>
> Cc: Vratko Po
Hi Ole,
Thanks for explaining!
The "programmable flow NAT" solution you describe sounds very
interesting, it may be better for us to focus on that if it's not too
far off in the future. Please let me know if, when and how I can help
with that.
Best regards,
Elias
> The NAT HA code was somethin
