Hi Nataraj,
It’s not possible with VCL at this point but it’s possible with builtin
applications. It’s just a matter of extending the connect api to support this.
Florin
> On Sep 25, 2019, at 6:16 PM, Nataraj Batchu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Today with VPP we cannot give endpoint info in sendto()
Hi,
Today with VPP we cannot give endpoint info in sendto() call. We have to do a
connect(udp_sock, endpoint_info) first and then invoke sendto(). This works.
But the question is how can I influence the source port of these packets?
Thanks,
-Nataraj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive al
Nexus and Jenkins are back up. Jobs are running. Please report any
issues to support.linuxfoundation.org.
Thank you,
Vanessa
On 09/25/2019 12:07 PM, Vanessa Valderrama wrote:
>
> Starting maintenance
>
>
> On 09/25/2019 11:02 AM, Vanessa Valderrama wrote:
>>
>> Jenkins has been placed in shut dow
Hi all,
I am trouble with endpoint-dependent NAT. I am running out of tcp
connections. Also, sessions are not deleted after the NAT timeout period.
Number of sessions remain almost the same every after no usage for a day or
so.
Here are the stats, nat config and timeouts:
https://gist.github.com
Starting maintenance
On 09/25/2019 11:02 AM, Vanessa Valderrama wrote:
>
> Jenkins has been placed in shut down mode to prepare for maintenance.
>
>
> On 09/23/2019 04:08 PM, Vanessa Valderrama wrote:
>>
>> *What:*
>>
>> LF will performing maintenance on the Nexus server to migrate data to
>> two
Jenkins has been placed in shut down mode to prepare for maintenance.
On 09/23/2019 04:08 PM, Vanessa Valderrama wrote:
>
> *What:*
>
> LF will performing maintenance on the Nexus server to migrate data to
> two new SSD volumes in attempt to resolve the intermittent issue with
> hung jobs we are
git grep ‘!am->is_mp_safe’
--a
> On 25 Sep 2019, at 10:24, Satya Murthy wrote:
>
> Thanks Andrew for the quick reply.
> Can you please point me to the code where the barrier lock is getting applied
> for acls.
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards,
> Murthy
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive
Thanks Andrew for the quick reply.
Can you please point me to the code where the barrier lock is getting applied
for acls.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Murthy
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#14051): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/140
Yes, ACL update messages are not marked as Mp-safe, consequently are subject to
barrier lock, thus we can use this pool in this way.
Pools are *not* thread safe, which is why for example the session pools for
reflexive acl processing are per-thread (see acl_fa_per_worker_data_t
structure).
--a