Great! Thanks Florin.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#13523): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/13523
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/32435763/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g
We believe this issue is resolved. We had to manually push the jobs to
Jenkins as a solution for now.
We are still investigating the root cause.
I am re-triggering jobs that weren't triggered during this incident.
Thank you,
Vanessa
On 07/17/2019 02:40 PM, Vanessa Valderrama wrote:
> We are cur
We are currently seeing an issue with Jenkins not displaying
https://jenkins.fd.io/view/vpp/ correctly. The scenario we are seeing is
the page spinning and displaying a random number of jobs to different users.
We apologize for the inconvenience. We are investigating this issue and
will have it re
Starting VPP 19.01.3 Maintenance Release now.
VPP Committers, Please do not merge any patches into stable/1901 until after
the VPP 19.01.3 is complete.
Thanks,
[https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/banners/standard/07_standard_graphic.png]
Swati Kher
Engineer - Software
Try configuring approximately nbuckets = (nitems / BIHASH_KVP_PER_PAGE). Make
sure that the hash function performs reasonably well on the particular keys
involved.
The scheme tolerates a mis-sized bucket array - lookup performance won't
change, to a first approximation - but space utilization b
Hi,
I've run into bihash crashing VPP with an out-of-memory error. After
investigation I found that the bihash has reached its configured
memory limit with far less entries that I would have expected.
Some numbers:
Type: bihash_8_8
bihash max. memory: 64MB
Buckets: 1024
Entries 200k
With that nu
Folks,
As announced at the last VPP community meeting, today we'll be starting the VPP
19.01.3 Maintenance Release at 1800UTC.
Currently there are no patches in stable/1901 that are not merged. Please
unicast me or Dave Wallace if you have a fix that needs to be included in this
maintenance r
Hi Matt,
Sounds like exactly what we need.
/neale
De : Matthew Smith
Date : mercredi 17 juillet 2019 à 14:52
À : "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
Cc : vpp-dev
Objet : Re: [vpp-dev] loopback admin status
Hi Neale,
Thanks for your reply.
I noticed that there is a function for IPv6 named
ip6_sw_inter
Hi Neale,
Thanks for your reply.
I noticed that there is a function for IPv6 named
ip6_sw_interface_admin_up_down() in src/vnet/ip/ip6_forward.c which seems
like it iterates the IPv6 addresses on an interface and adds or deletes the
routes for each address if the interface is brought up or down.
Dear all,
I want to run QoS on multiple ports using VPP. Below is the output:
--
root@router:~/Router# /usr/bin/vpp -c /etc/vpp/startup.conf
vlib_plugin_early_init:361: plugin path
/usr/lib/vpp_plugins:/usr/lib64/vpp_plugins
load_one_plugi
Hi Matt,
I would tend to agree with you. The interface’s IP addresses should not be
programmed in the FIB if the interface is down.
/neale
De : au nom de "Matthew Smith via Lists.Fd.Io"
Répondre à : "mgsm...@netgate.com"
Date : mardi 16 juillet 2019 à 21:42
À : vpp-dev
Cc : "vpp-dev@list
11 matches
Mail list logo