I believe you can see this issue with any NIC. (Invalid value being
returned from var_arg). It does not not always crash, but the value is
always wrong.
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 6:58 PM Damjan Marion wrote:
>
>
> > On 23 May 2019, at 15:21, siddarth rai wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am using a
Hi Andrew,
Sure. I am in the process of doing the harness code to test the ACL-plugin
approach.
Will post the results to this thread in a week's time.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Murthy
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#13135): https://list
Hi Chul-Woong,
Both projects are actually based on ligato/vpp-agent
(https://github.com/ligato/vpp-agent), which is a control plane for VPP.
The sfc controller from ligato however is most likely outdated and probably
will be deprecated. The NSM project, albeit bit younger and very much
in-pro
So, to me “received from an external entity” seems like squarely a task for a
separate control plane entity - because presumably you will also want to
resynchronize that info upon the restart of the VPP, right ?
In any case, seems like your use case will require some investments in either
case
We recently tripped over the “vpe-icmp4-oam” scheme. It’s a historical artifact
which consumes for-us icmp4 echo_reply packets. Net of switching init function
ordering to a constraint-based topological sort, it reappeared.
The ping CLI input node has been consuming for-us ip4 icmp packets for qu
Hi Andrew,
Our custom plugin will receive these rules per each session from an external
entity.
The number of sessions may go into millions.
Yes, as you rightly said, these are rules are very dynamic in nature and these
will be added and deleted with addition of session and it's deletion
respe
Hi Thomas,
> Benoit, they do get dropped! Easier to see on this server.
> I had previously thought they were missreported by ui.
> By the way, this works on 19.02 with DPDK mlx driver.
> https://gist.github.com/tfherbert/c5b1ece10b1d37ca9df0752925f7f53c
Thanks! This is weird, and I actually repro
Hi Neale,
Thank you very much for the reply.
The main problem that we are facing is:
The plugin that we are planning to develop need to configure the classification
rules dynamically ( ACLs ).
Hence, we can not use VPP-API approach to configure the ACLs first.
We need to add the ACLs based on so
> On 23 May 2019, at 15:21, siddarth rai wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am using an older version of VPP(18.01) but I checked the code of 19.04 and
> I couldn't find any change in problematic area.
>
> I sometimes get a crash with "Show PCI" command.
>
> From the core, it seems to be crashing here
Hello,
I am using an older version of VPP(18.01) but I checked the code of 19.04
and I couldn't find any change in problematic area.
I sometimes get a crash with "Show PCI" command.
>From the core, it seems to be crashing here :
"format_vlib_pci_vpd (
s=0x2ad325f2cb58 ":02:00.0 0 14e
Hi Uzzam,
All these:
sudo vppctl set interface l2 bridge loopX 1
Should be:
sudo vppctl set interface l2 bridge loopX 1 bvi
/neale
De : au nom de Uzzam Javed
Répondre à : Uzzam Javed
Date : jeudi 23 mai 2019 à 14:50
À : "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Cc : "b...@xflowresearch.com"
Objet : [vpp-d
Hi All,I using 1901 build in CentOS 7.6 and am facing a crash after few seconds when adding loopback interface in bvi. My config for VPP is below:sudo vppctl create loopback interfacesudo vppctl create loopback interfacesudo vppctl set interface state loop0 upsudo vppctl set interface state loop1
Hello,
I have written a basic middlebox plugin some months ago and pushed it to
vppsb. As the action on this repo is very low, I would like to make sure
that someone saw it. I have found uses for it, so others might as well. If
you are too busy, please ignore this message =)
https://gerrit.fd.i
Satya,
How often do you plan to update/ how many ranges do you plan to have ?
And what is the source of information defining the ranges ?
Acl plugin does encapsulate some of the complexity, but seeing as you seem to
want to use the it as a dynamic traffic-driven datastructure, classifier tables
HI Murthy,
There are two plugins, that I know of, that use the ACL as a service; ACL based
forwarding (ABF) and group based policy (GBP).
Both of these plugins expect that the user first configures the ACL using the
ACL plugin, then passes the index of the ACL during ABF/GBP programming. This
Thanks Andrew for the reply.
Instead, now, we are looking at "ACL lookup context" framework to add them as
acl rules and use for packet classification. Hope this should work for us
without any issues.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Murthy
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to th
Hi ,
We are planning to use "ACL as a service" framework using the lookup contexts
for performing packet classifications from our custom plugin. While this seem
to be achievable, we have one issue at our hand.
We would like to program the ACLs ( add/delete of ACL rules ) also from our
custom p
Hi Thomas,
Could you attach a packet trace?
~# vppctl clear trace
~# vppctl trace add rdma-input 10
~# vppctl ping
~# vppctl show trace
Thanks
ben
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas F Herbert
> Sent: mercredi 22 mai 2019 21:29
> To: vpp-dev
> Cc: Benoit Ganne (bganne)
> Subject: vp
18 matches
Mail list logo