Can you please suggest what other lighter ways can be used to deal with a large
number of sessions ?
Currently, I’ve changed the vlib_error_t to use 14 bits for node. That gives me
1<<14 node indices and roughly 7000-8000 interfaces. To further increase the
number of sessions is it suitable t
Hi,
Can someone please help on this ?
Thanks,
Akshay
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#12708): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12708
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/30851777/21656
Mute #vpp: https://lists.fd.io/mk?hashta
How can make this ACL form a network, example with src 10.0.0.0/24
Thanks
El 2 de abril de 2019 9:10:39 PM GMT-04:00, star escribió:
>Hello all，
>
>I am trying to test ACL funtion, input ACL is OK, But output ACL is not
>effective
>
>my configuration as below, is there anything wrong in my
> On 4 Apr 2019, at 17:07, G. Paul Ziemba wrote:
>
> I dont have time to read that draft, but it looks to me that during
> decryption you can simply spray plaintext into multiple buffers, no?
> The relevant aspect of the spec is that multiple payload packets may be
> included in a single tunn
>
> I dont have time to read that draft, but it looks to me that during
> decryption you can simply spray plaintext into multiple buffers, no?
The relevant aspect of the spec is that multiple payload packets may be
included in a single tunnel packet. These payload packets must be de-aggregated
Hello all,
I found a work around to this:
{
"classify-table": [
{
"name": "table0",
"classify-session": [
{
"match":
"00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:64:45:01:04:00:00
Hi,
okay, so I think what happens is that on the IP OUTACL path the
classifier table needs to look differently, but i am not sure there is
an easy way to deal with this within the "friendly" version of the
debug CLI...
Take a look at test/test_classifier.py, class
TestClassifierIPOut(TestClassifi
Hi ，
The classify table info is shown below， Thank you very much for your reply.
VPP1810# show classify tables verbose
TableIdx Sessions NextTbl NextNode
0 1-1-1
Heap: total: 2.06M, used: 13405245765845824, free: 2.06M, trimmable: 2.06M
no traced allocatio
hi Xue,
could you send the output of "show classify tables index 0 verbose"
after you set that table as outacl ?
Thanks!
--a
On 4/4/19, xyxue wrote:
>
> Hi guys，
>
> I am trying to test ACL funtion, input ACL is OK, But output ACL is not
> effective
>
> my configuration as below, is there anyt
Hi guys，
I am trying to test ACL funtion, input ACL is OK, But output ACL is not
effective
my configuration as below, is there anything wrong in my configuration? Thanks
for your response
VPP1810# show version
vpp v18.10-7~g6ff8790-dirty built by root on localhost.localdomain at Mon Apr
1
Hi Ruijing,
Here is the deck that will be presented on ONS NA 2019 this week.
VPP Accelerated High Performance & Scalable L3DSR L4 Load Balancer on Top Clos
https://events.linuxfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/ONS.NA_.2019.VPP_LB.merged.pdf
There is some performance data on VPP L3DSR (on
> On 4 Apr 2019, at 05:19, G. Paul Ziemba wrote:
>
> We do that by cloning, you can have multiple head buffers with small amount
> if data to accommodate l2/l3 headers and then such buffers have b->next_buffer
> pointing to shared tail buffer(s). Tail buffer(s) just need to have ref_count
> se
Hi, All
Do somebody do performance compare between vpp loadbalancer and LVS?
Thanks,
-Ruijing
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#12697): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12697
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/30894146/21656
13 matches
Mail list logo
