Ah, thank you. That seems much more logical.
(Still familiarizing myself with tools in this toolbox. Haven't found the 10mm
socket yet.)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#12620): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12620
Mute This T
From: Damjan Marion
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 3:59 PM
To: Nitin Saxena
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Narayana Prasad Raju Athreya
Subject: Re: [EXT] [vpp-dev] 128 byte cache line support
On 22 Mar 2019, at 09:35, Nitin Saxena
mailto:nsax...@marvell.com>> wrote:
Hi Damjan,
>> Can we conclu
This part of the code mentioned let any MAC address with mcast bit through:
> + /*if (!ethernet_address_cast (e0->dst_address) &&
> (hi->hw_address != 0) &&
> !eth_mac_equal ((u8 *) e0, hi->hw_address))
> error0 = ETHERNET_ERROR_L3_MAC_MISMATCH;
Reg
Thanks Damjan. Will look into it and find some way to resolve it.
Thanks,
Hongjun
From: Damjan Marion [mailto:dmar...@me.com]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 3:41 PM
To: Ni, Hongjun
Cc: l...@cisco.com; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Status of PPPoE Plugin
On 22 Mar 2019, at 07:34, Ni
> On 22 Mar 2019, at 09:35, Nitin Saxena wrote:
>
> Hi Damjan,
>
> >> Can we conclude that there is no technical arguments?
>
> On technical aspects:
> Changing VLIB structure to 128 byte from current 256 byte (for our target)
> In case of forwarding we only use single Dcache line till ipv4
Hi all,
I am trying to assign v6 address to clients using DHCP PD. I have ISC
Bind configured to provide v6 prefixes and configured dhcpv6 proxy
using the following command.
vppctl set dhcpv6 proxy server 2001:xxx::10d::1 src-address
2001:xxx::10d::700
It is working for clients from non
Hi Damjan,
>> Can we conclude that there is no technical arguments?
On technical aspects:
1. Changing VLIB structure to 128 byte from current 256 byte (for our target)
* In case of forwarding we only use single Dcache line till ipv4-input
(because of packet parsing info in second 64B
—
Damjan
> On 22 Mar 2019, at 01:37, Nitin Saxena wrote:
>
>
> From: Damjan Marion
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 12:35 AM
> To: Nitin Saxena
> Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Narayana Prasad Raju Athreya
> Subject: Re: [EXT] [vpp-dev] 128 byte cache line support
>
>
>
>> On 21 Mar 2019, at 17
> On 22 Mar 2019, at 07:34, Ni, Hongjun wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> For first PADI packet, its destination MAC is broadcast address.
> Not sure it is accepted by ethernet-input node?
Sure it does, otherwise arp, dhcp, ... will not work.
> Do we need special process to handle it?
> 5.1 The PPPo
