Hello,
Is there any roadmap or suggestion to support QUIC protocol in VPP?
Thanks！
Davi
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#12523): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12523
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/30423896/
Patch url: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/18273
-- Original --
From: "Joe Zhou";
Date: Thu, Mar 14, 2019 10:06 AM
To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io";
Subject: is sw_interface_dump api bug?
Dear VPP developers,
I used sw_interface_dump api to get sw interface info
Dear VPP developers,
I used sw_interface_dump api to get sw interface info, but found the result
is not right following these steps :
1) create a loop interface with instance 10, ie loop10
2) create a loop inteerface with instance 1, ie loop1
3) use sw_interface_dump to get
> On Mar 13, 2019, at 2:16 PM, OMER AHARONIAN wrote:
>
> As Go provides both good performance and ease of development, I'd be happy to
> use it instead of C. Aren't there any projects out there that do so?
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019, 21:07 Damjan Marion wrote:
Here is a Go design using DPDK c
As Go provides both good performance and ease of development, I'd be happy
to use it instead of C. Aren't there any projects out there that do so?
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019, 21:07 Damjan Marion wrote:
>
>
> > On 13 Mar 2019, at 19:42, OMER AHARONIAN wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > My name is Omer and I'm
At least in concept, it would be possible to write plugins in languages other
than C or C++.
With respect to golang...: cgo might just about work, but the last time I
tested it, it cost around 300 clock cycles to cross the c <---> golang
boundary. When processing packets at speed, that’s the en
> On 13 Mar 2019, at 19:42, OMER AHARONIAN wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My name is Omer and I'm planning to start using VPP as part of a project I'm
> working on. I was trying to find an answer to the following question but
> without much success. I was hoping you might have the answer.
> VPP provides
Hi,
My name is Omer and I'm planning to start using VPP as part of a project
I'm working on. I was trying to find an answer to the following question
but without much success. I was hoping you might have the answer.
VPP provides the I/S for developing custom plugins that can be hooked into
a graph
Hi Sam,
Would you be willing to create unittests for the scenarios you are testing?
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 1:00 PM Ole Troan wrote:
> > I am setting MTU to 1500 and trying to test larger packets. (by enabling
> reassembly feature on interfaces)
> > It seems to work fine on regular interfaces.
> I am setting MTU to 1500 and trying to test larger packets. (by enabling
> reassembly feature on interfaces)
> It seems to work fine on regular interfaces. and On tunnel interfaces packets
> are getting struck in reassembly saying inconsistent UDP/IP lengths.
> So thought of checking with the c
Hi Ole,Thanks for the quick response.
I am setting MTU to 1500 and trying to test larger packets. (by enabling
reassembly feature on interfaces)It seems to work fine on regular interfaces.
and On tunnel interfaces packets are getting struck in reassembly saying
inconsistent UDP/IP lengths.So th
The vdev_netvsc virtual driver that is used to do initialization
on Hyper-V/Azure won't work without failsafe and tap device.
If the related devices aren't present, it causes confusing errors
later in initialization when it crafts devargs and attempts to
send them to a device driver that isn't ther
On 13 Mar 2019, at 16:10, Lijian Zhang (Arm Technology China)
mailto:lijian.zh...@arm.com>> wrote:
Yes, Damjan, will submit the patch to gerrit for public review, after finishing
internal review inside VPP/Aarch64.
Just for my curiosity, why your “internal” reviewers cannot just use gerrit fo
Yes, Damjan, will submit the patch to gerrit for public review, after finishing
internal review inside VPP/Aarch64.
This email is just to get the idea from community beforehand.
Thanks.
From: Damjan Marion (damarion)
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 11:04 PM
To: Lijian Zhang (Arm Technology China
Dear Lijian,
We use gerrit for code review, so please submit your patch there…
Thanks,
--
Damjan
On 13 Mar 2019, at 16:01, Lijian Zhang (Arm Technology China)
mailto:lijian.zh...@arm.com>> wrote:
Hi Maintainers,
The current aarch64 version of VPP package distro in cloud repository
(https://
Hi Maintainers,
The current aarch64 version of VPP package distro in cloud repository
(https://packagecloud.io/fdio/master/ubuntu) is made on a ThunderX server.
During the compilation process, no matter what type of make target is (either
binaries, e.g, build/build-release, or packages, e.g., pkg
I bet that more than 90% of subscribers to this list doesn’t know what
AD4,AD6,AS4,AS6 means (including myself).
Out of code snippets you provided, looks like it is SR related.
So might be worth adding existing code author(s) to CC, as maybe they are not
reading this list very frequently.
“git
I am new to VPP and experimenting with it.
I was able to get Reass/Frag working on regular Interfaces.
The question i have is does Reassembly and Fragmentation supported on Tunnel
interfaces(Both VXLAN/IPSec).If supported, is there any config knob i need to
enable in addition to enabling feature
Team
Am resending the same again as I am not sure the former one had reached the
forum , Sorry
Best Regards
Gunaseelan V
98408 60856
From: Gunaseelan Venkatachary - ERS, HCL Tech
Sent: Friday, March 8, 2019 3:00 PM
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Standard VPP functionality for AD4,AD6,AS4,AS6
On 13 Mar 2019, at 10:19, Lollita Liu
mailto:lollita@ericsson.com>> wrote:
Hi, Damjan.
We found in vlib_buffer_free_inline with CLIB_HAVE_VEC128, buffers will always
be freed one by one, not via the 4 packets batch fast path. The phenomenon is
the same by calling via avf_device_class_tx_f
Hi, Damjan.
We found in vlib_buffer_free_inline with CLIB_HAVE_VEC128, buffers will always
be freed one by one, not via the 4 packets batch fast path. The phenomenon is
the same by calling via avf_device_class_tx_fn or via error_drop.
It will add about 20 CPU cycles in my test case, the p
> I am new to VPP and experimenting with it.
> I was able to get Reass/Frag working on regular Interfaces.
>
> The question i have is does Reassembly and Fragmentation supported on Tunnel
> interfaces(Both VXLAN/IPSec).
> If supported, is there any config knob i need to enable in addition to
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
