Just like the regular interface you are using:
create sub-interfaces eth0 181
set interface state eth0.181 up
set interface ip address eth0.181 18.1.0.141/24
ip route add 0.0.0.0/0 via 18.1.0.1 eth0.181
Note there is some performance penalty using vlan sub-intf. As I can see on my
setup, > 10% o
Not at my computer right now, but since flow packets are locally generated
there might not be trace information for them.
Looks like 13 ipfix packets were sent though.
You didn’t see those on the wire?
Cheers
Ole
> On 14 Jan 2019, at 08:14, emma sdi wrote:
>
> Dear Ole,
>
> I checked ipfix
Hello, all
I will use a new API added in openssl 3.0.0 master for a better async
communication, but I found that some API in openssl 3.0.0 has deprecated, such
as EC_POINT_get_affine_coordinates_GFp/EC_POINT_set_affine_coordinates_GFp.
I added a patch to fix this problem to make VPP compatible
Dear Ole,
I checked ipfix by flowprobe and I have the same problem again. I don't see any
ipfix packets log in "vppctl sh trace".
vppctl sh error
Count Node Reason
14802 null-node blackholed packets
13
Hi all,
How can I use the sub-interface after creating ?
#create sub-interfaces GigabitEthernet2/0/0 11
Does it means the VLAN ID ?
I want to let GigabitEthernet2/0/0 && GigabitEthernet2/0/0 to be same VLAN
(ID:11).
How should I do?
Thanks.
wangchuan...@163.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Link
What do people think about changing the CI gate verify job to only run VIRL
jobs for change-sets that touch the src/ folder?
It seems like the current process uses more resources than needed.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11904):