Re: [vpp-dev] Sequence Number Checking in TCP Protocol

Hi Florin, Nice! Jim > On Jan 2, 2019, at 6:10 PM, Florin Coras wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Here’s the patch [1]. > > Regards, > Florin > > [1] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/16675/ > >>> On Dec 29, 2018, at 10:59 PM, Florin Coras via Lists.Fd.Io >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Dec 29, 2018, a

Re: [vpp-dev] Sequence Number Checking in TCP Protocol

Hi Jim, Here’s the patch [1]. Regards, Florin [1] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/16675/ > On Dec 29, 2018, at 10:59 PM, Florin Coras via Lists.Fd.Io > wrote: > > > >> On Dec 29, 2018, at 8:26 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Dec 29, 2018, at 6:42 PM, Florin Coras wrote: >>> >>>

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP 19.01 + SPDK

Hi Ram, Tomasz cc'ed, amongst others, have been working on integrating SPDK with VPP's host stack. Maybe the patch here [1] can provide some answers. Florin [1] https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/417056 > On Jan 2, 2019, at 2:05 PM, Ramaraj Pandian wrote: > > Hello, > > I am new

[vpp-dev] VPP 19.01 + SPDK

Hello, I am new to VPP and trying to integrate VPP with SPDK. I see old VPP version generates .a files as well along with .so files which were useful to SPDK with. But latest version, it generates only .so files, I tried to change /src/cmake/library.cmake to build static library as well but bui

[vpp-dev] VPP/DPDK performance with Madvise (Transparent Huge pages)

Hi, We are using VPP 18.01. We have seen that in case Transparent Hugepage is enable with Madvise . VPP does not take benefit of Annonymous Huge Pages. Does anybody have any idea about the same ? Thanks, CB -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply On

Re: [vpp-dev] IPv6 fragmentation at SRv6 encap node

Yosh, > I have a one question. > Does VPP support IPv6 fragmentation at SRv6 encap node? > > From RFC2473 section 7, My understanding is that the encap node attempt to > fragment when a outgoing encapsulated packet mtu size is over MTU, but it > doesn't. > Is that my missunderstanding? > The si