Hi Burt and Brian,
VPP has leveraged cmake to compile code after release 18.10, but vppsb still
use make to compile code.
We tried to port router plugin to VPP, and it can work, but it is not accepted
by VPP community.
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/15062/
You need to rework VPPSB’s building system
I just tried building on master of both vpp and vppsb. I just had to add
#include to tap_inject_node.c. It seems like that bug has been
around a long time. I used the directions in vppsb/router/README.md.
Burt
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply
Hi Tim,
I have been spending about twenty years trying to convince people not to repeat
all the wrong things we did with IPv4, proxy-arp being one of them.
It would be interesting to understand the use case for this?
Cheers
Ole
> On 13 Dec 2018, at 18:20, Steele, Tim wrote:
>
> I see that
I have used 4.4-2 for while now on arm64/AArch64 systems using source
compile.
Let me know if you face issues with any specfic version.
Thank you
Sirshak Das
Yang, Liang writes:
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11598): https://list
Thanks for this one... If you can spare the time, please fix the doxygen tag /
comment in .../src/vppinfra/vec.h...
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Dave Wallace
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 12:33 PM
To: dmar...@me.com; Mohammed Alshohayeb
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-de
I have submitted a patch [1] to update the documentation per this email
thread.
Thanks,
-daw-
[1] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/16467
On 12/12/2018 4:54 PM, Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io wrote:
That should be corrected to:
Users may specify the alignment for* first data element *via the
vec*_align
I see that IPv6 ND proxy was added in VPP 17.04.
I've been experimenting with VPP 18.07.1 and found that ND proxy is only
possible for a specific address; it does not appear that proxy can be
configured based on matching a prefix. For example,
vpp# set ip6 nd proxy FortyGigabitEthernet82/0/2 fc
Can you provide the code? Personally, I would be interested in seeing your
approach.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11594): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11594
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/28718629/21656
Group Ow
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11593): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11593
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/28742410/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch
The test framework spawns vpp with only one main thread and no workers.
I had a patch which uses also worker threads but it never made it to
git. It's grossly outdated by now.
Anyhow, I don't think that's really possible with the current packet
geneator implementation.
Quoting pvi...@vinciconsult
10 matches
Mail list logo
