Hi Ole.
I could see a use for having an API call that populates the properties of an
IntEnum.
Paul
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11520): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11520
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/2861011
Checkout:
https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/pull/5177
The Envoy side modularity work is in progress :)
Ed
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 6:45 PM dado via Lists.Fd.Io wrote:
> Hi Florin,
>
> Thanks for the quick response. Do you know who I may contact regarding
> about VPP/Envoy integration status?
Hi Florin,
Thanks for the quick response. Do you know who I may contact regarding about
VPP/Envoy integration status?
Thanks,
Dai
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11518): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11518
Mute This Topic:
Hi Dai,
No. The release plan is just a statement of intent. The actual release notes
are here [1].
I know there are ongoing efforts in this area but I’m not sure about their
current status.
Florin
[1] https://git.fd.io/vpp/tree/RELEASE.md
> On Dec 6, 2018, at 2:34 PM, via Lists.Fd.Io
> w
Hello,
Was VPP/Envoy integration delivered in VPP 18.07 as mentioned in the release
plan (https://wiki.fd.io/view/Projects/vpp/Release_Plans/Release_Plan_18.07)? I
cannot seem to find the code nor any setup instructions in VPP 18.07 (or 18.10)
branch.
Thanks,
Dai
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links:
On 6 Dec 2018, at 16:56, Jon Loeliger wrote:
>> That is now: typedef u32 ip4_address[4];
>
> And we mean s/u32/u8/ here, right? :-)
It was clearly a Freudian slip. My subconscious expects all addresses to be 128
bits. :-)
IPv6 has taken over the world, even IPv4 addresses are now 128 bits.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 6:04 AM Ole Troan wrote:
> All,
>
Hi Ole,
> Here is an update on API progress.
>
> In the long process of making types in the API language more explicit I
> have a few changes merged and a few in the pipeline:
>
Hooray!
> - Type aliases. Previously any new user define
Hi,
https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/NAT
NAT44 (vanilla/simple and endpoint-dependent mode) lazily delete expired
sessions. When inserting to session lookup hash and bucket is full, expired
session is overwritten.
Matus
-Original Message-
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Yuan Fan
Se
Hi,
I am currently studying the VPP source code, and try to understand the specific
implementation of your NAT plugin. I noticed that the NAT is using hash lookup
in the release.md. I am asking about is that the kind of algorithm you use for
the lookup in NAT and also how you handle the timeo
Glad to hear that. I'm not surprised, the problem was anything but subtle... D.
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Juraj Linkeš
Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2018 4:13 AM
To: Dave Barach (dbarach) ; Lijian Zhang (Arm Technology
China)
Cc: Damjan Marion ; Steven Luong (sluong) ;
vpp-dev@lists
I don't think that the current PoC ikev2 code can do that.
Regards,
Klement
Quoting wangchuan...@163.com (2018-12-06 11:29:12)
>Klement,
> i saw the ipsec_sad_add_del_entry api , but in my mind, it was used to
>create manual ipsec tunnel .
>how to set the ipsec tunnel negotiate
Klement,
i saw the ipsec_sad_add_del_entry api , but in my mind, it was used to
create manual ipsec tunnel .
how to set the ipsec tunnel negotiated out by ikev2 to be udp-encaped using
this api?
can you give me some tips?
thanks!
wangchuan...@163.com
发件人： Klement Sekera
发送时间： 2018-12-06
ipsec_sad_add_del_entry API - udp_encap parameter must be set to 1
Regards,
Klement
Quoting wangchuan...@163.com (2018-12-06 02:16:35)
>hi Klement,
> which api? Thanks
>
>--
>
>wangchuan...@163.com
>
>
Dave, I was able to verify that the fix works and thus removed the test from
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/16282/.
Thanks
From: Dave Barach (dbarach) [mailto:dbar...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2018 2:52 PM
To: Lijian Zhang (Arm Technology China)
Cc: Juraj Linkeš ; Damjan Marion ;
Ste
Hi, Neale,
Thanks for the info, that solved the problem!
This might be something to put into the main section rather than
"advanced", and possibly even in the README.md that goes along with the
vppsb/router.
It would probably actually be more helpful if the parameter were an IPv4
prefix-count ra
15 matches
Mail list logo
