Hi, All
I'm configuring VPP as VxLAN multicast mode over multiple servers. To simplify
the topology, I only used two servers: server1 as VPP; server2 using vxlan
kernel mode.
Server1:
set interface state TenGigabitEthernet3d/0/1 up
set interface ip address TenGigabitEthernet3d/0/1 172.168.1.1/2
Hi Florin,
Netlink/router plugin is implemented as some graph nodes in the data plane,
It is better to use C FIB APIs to update FIB.
Thanks,
Hongjun
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Florin Coras
Sent: Monday, November 5, 2018 11:06 AM
To: Ni, Hongjun
Cc: Damja
Hi there,
> Does someone know where is the definition of IP_PROTOCOL_ICMP? I searched
> all the directories in VPP, but could not find it.
src/vnet/ip/protocols.def
Best regards,
Ole
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11093): ht
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 4:47 PM Ole Troan wrote:
>
> David,
>
> > on a related note: do you intend that people will add to the
> > stat_directory_type_t with more complex specific types or keep it to
> > more primitive generic types?
>
> I was thinking of generic types, like if it is a counter, a c
Hello everyone,
Does someone know where is the definition of IP_PROTOCOL_ICMP? I searched
all the directories in VPP, but could not find it.
Appreciated for your help!
可用于iOS的myMail发送
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11091): ht
Agreed with Damjan. Why not manage this as a separate project, just like
Sweetcomb? Goal for Sandbox was to host plugins that could later convert into
fully fledged projects.
Also, can’t netlink/router plugins use the binary APIs instead of, I would
assume, raw C FIB APIs? That should simplify
David,
> on a related note: do you intend that people will add to the
> stat_directory_type_t with more complex specific types or keep it to
> more primitive generic types?
I was thinking of generic types, like if it is a counter, a counter vector, or
a gauge.
And the user would have to know if
Hi Damjan,
With some talks with customers, they want us to provide two options:
One option is what you mentioned here, routing daemon is integrated with VPP
through binary APIs directly.
That is what we plan to do in Sweetcomb project.
Another option is to leverage legacy routing daemon without
Personally i think it should stay in vppsb. I agree we miss integration with
open source routing protocol implementation but it should be done natively
trough binary APIs and not with netlink hacks...
—
Damjan
> On 4 Nov 2018, at 11:52, Ni, Hongjun wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> We are workin
Hi Guys,
We are working on moving VPPSB Netlink to VPP main repo:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/15062/ Port VPPSB's rtnetlink & router plugin to VPP
main
This patch is under review and consolidating, but it could work well and you
can use it.
Thanks,
Hongjun
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp
10 matches
Mail list logo