Hi daw,
Thank you for your reply . Another question :If the 'listen ,send,recv,connect'
will cause the cpu utilization 100%?
Thanks,
Xyxue
发件人: Dave Wallace
发送时间: 2018-06-05 02:22
收件人: vpp-dev; 薛欣颖
主题: Re: [vpp-dev] The VCL server CPU utilization is 100% , if there is no
message to the epo
Hello Vanessa,
Thank you for an explanation. Indeed this will impact certain things that are
planned like "automatic bisecting" (downloading and testing range of
artifacts). Let me analyze current situation with CSIT team and get back to you.
Peter Mikus
Engineer – Software
Cisco Systems Limite
Hi Steven,
Thanks for your help. I am using vhost-user client (VPP in container)
and vhost-user server (VPP in host). I thought it should work.
create vhost socket /var/run/vpp/sock3.sock server (On host)
create vhost socket /var/run/usvhost1 (On container)
Can you please point me to a document
Ravi,
VPP only supports vhost-user in the device mode. In your example, the host, in
device mode, and the container also in device mode do not make a happy couple.
You need one of them, either the host or container, running in driver mode
using the dpdk vdev virtio_user command in startup.conf.
Hi Steven
Though crash is not happening anymore, there is still an issue with Rx
and Tx. To eliminate whether it is testpmd or vpp, I decided to run
(1) VPP vhost-user server on host-x
(2) Run VPP in a container on host-x and vhost-user client port
connecting to vhost-user server.
Still doesn't
Peter,
The fd.io.master.centos7 repo had to be cleaned up significantly to eliminate
Jenkins build timeout errors. This was discussed in the TSC. Going forward
we'll only be keeping an average of 10 of the current release candidate
artifacts in the repository. Please let me know if this reten
Xyxue,
This is a known by-product of the existing [prototype] epoll_wait
implementation. There is currently no mechanism in epoll_wait to have
the thread block on a condvar which would cause the thread to sleep
instead of sitting in a continuous polling loop.
Fixing this is on the list of th
On 06/04/2018 09:28 AM, Damjan Marion (damarion) wrote:
Dear Thomas,
That should be doable today, as long as VPP version supports version
of dpdk you want to link against.
From the spec file you can invoke autotools project directly, and pass
--enable-dpdk-shared to ./configure
./config
Hi,
Gerrit patch: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/12813/ failing because dpdk
package is pre-installed on ThunderX and not compiled during this patch.
Logs from:
https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-arm-verify-master-ubuntu1604/617/console
=
12:22:26 make -C dpdk install-deb
12:22:26 make[1]
On VPP, packets with VLANs does not imply it go into a separate bridge domains
(BDs). For your case, your sub-interfaces for VLAN 100 and 200 on your host
interface should be put into separate bridge domains, e.g. you can use BD IDs
100 and 200, and have the correct behavior. As I described in
Dear Thomas,
That should be doable today, as long as VPP version supports version of dpdk
you want to link against.
>From the spec file you can invoke autotools project directly, and pass
>--enable-dpdk-shared to ./configure
./configure --enable-dpdk-shared
--prefix=/wherever/rpm/spec/file/w
Hi,
We are interested in understanding if we can learn mac address on a per VLAN
basis in VPP.
If an interface 'X' is part of VLAN 100, and interface 'Y' is part of VLAN 200
A host 'H' with mac "00:10:94:00:00:33" is behind a switch, ports of which are
part of both VLAN 100 and VLAN 200.
Mac sh
OVS as of 9.x now uses shared libraries with dpdk packaged separately
for downstream
I want to raise the issue of shared vs. static libraries for dpdk in vpp.
Would there be any performance penalty to going with shared?
--Tom
--
*Thomas F Herbert*
NFV and Fast Data Planes
Networking Group Off
Hi,
I had configured VPP with IKEv2 & the other end is Strongswan.VPN tunnel is
established successfully. When I start ping from Strongswan I can see
encapsulated packet towards VPP & VPP is able to successfilly decap it & give
it to host. But ICMP reply from host is by passed through VPP.When I
Hi guys,
I‘m testing the VCL . The VCL server CPU utilization is 100% ,if there is no
message to the epoll_wait. Is there anything I can do to slove it?
Is there the same problem in the VCL client?
Thanks,
Xyxue
Hi,
I had configured VPP with IKEv2 & the other end is Strongswan.
VPN tunnel is established successfully. When I start ping from Strongswan I can
see encapsulated packet towards VPP & VPP is able to successfilly decap it &
give it to host. But ICMP reply from host is by passed through VPP.
Whe
16 matches
Mail list logo