Correct. dpdk is statically linked into dpdk_plugin.so.
--
Damjan
> On 4 May 2018, at 13:36, Yang, Zhiyong wrote:
>
> Damjan,
> Since dpdk is running as plugin in VPP, I misunderstood dpdk
> was used in shared lib.
> In fact, dpdk is compiled as static lib firstly and dpdk_p
To be direct: please switch to a supported compiler. Making a large number of
trivial changes to accommodate gcc-4 is the tip of the iceberg.
After that, you’ll notice that certain files take minutes to compile, and that
the object code isn’t the best, either.
D.
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On
Damjan,
Since dpdk is running as plugin in VPP, I misunderstood dpdk
was used in shared lib.
In fact, dpdk is compiled as static lib firstly and dpdk_plugin call dpdk
functions, right?
Thanks
Zhiyong
From: Damjan Marion [mailto:dmarion.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 4, 201
You cannot have nodes attached to sw_if_index. But my guess is that you want to
know which features are enabled on the specific interface.
That can be done with "show interface features".
--
Damjan
> On 4 May 2018, at 01:18, pradpate wrote:
>
> Team,
> While adding a node I am using followi
Justin,
> How can I "connect" to a specific instance of VPP through the python API ?
>
> Each instance (together, they form a topology) is run as follow:
> sudo vpp unix { log /tmp/vpp1.log cli-listen /run/vpp/cli-vpp1.sock }
> api-segment { prefix vpp1 } plugins { plugin dpdk_plugin.so { disab
Last time I was looking into dpdk hotplug, i was not under impression that it
was very usable for our use case but that was long time ago so maybe things
changed.
We can possibly work on that, but it will be major surgery in dpdk plugin code.
--
Damjan
> On 2 May 2018, at 13:46, Ray Kinsella
if you build vpp out-of-tree (by invoking autotools configure/make from src/
directly)
you should be able to use shared libraries, but I would not be surprised that
minor fixing of autotools files will be needed knowing the fact
that such scenario was not recently used.
May I ask what are you t
This raises general question about DPDK HQOS in VPP, I don't think we have
anybody on this list who can help
with question like this one. Should be better to take it out than to keep
something unmaintained, incomplete and untested?
--
Damjan
> On 1 May 2018, at 15:32, Reza Mirzaei wrote:
>
I would suggest that instead of:
typedef struct
{
u16 *resource_idx;
struct rte_crypto_op **ops;
u16 cipher_resource_idx[IPSEC_CRYPTO_N_ALG];
u16 auth_resource_idx[IPSEC_INTEG_N_ALG];
CLIB_CACHE_LINE_ALIGN_MARK (pad);
} crypto_worker_main_t __attribute__ ((aligned (CLIB_CACHE_LINE_BY
